Unwittingly proving Gibson's 1st Law of BBC Bias: You only think it's biased against the thing that you believe, otherwise you only hear facts

📍 Project based in Liverpool in @livevobiomech.bsky.social

🥼 The team includes @tguillerme.bsky.social @toriherridge.bsky.social @nottswildlife.bsky.social and me!

🔗 Project description: www.findaphd.com/phds/project...

Two’s too many, three’s not enough #cocktailrules 🍸

Wow, Dave. You must think i am a really terrible person. I am sorry I didn’t add any frills or emojis or whatever to make it clear but I really did not say it in that tone. I promise. I was just making what i thought was an interesting observation based on my experience. Anyway…

I have not suggested that no one has editorial standards (?!); I have said that expertise is typically self-defined. There is a separate editorial level of 'who do i get on the show in the first place?' But expertise is a tricky area -- who decides? And how?

I have worked in TV since 2014, and I understand

I think until you have tried to find a contributor for a topical show, with v tight turnaround, it's hard to appreciate how difficult it is. I don't disagree it is a problem, but it's kind of. feature of the system rather than a bug, and there are no easy fixes.

WHAT DO YOU MEAN JOSH I HAVE A LIFE

I straddle talent and expert contributor in my broadcast roles. In both, I have always been asked how i want to be introduced.