datavizproject.com/data-type/ji...
datavizproject.com/data-type/ji...
Best case scenario is that just makes the Dems the bad guys, it lasts for one election and then split control undoes it after 2010.
Best case scenario is that just makes the Dems the bad guys, it lasts for one election and then split control undoes it after 2010.
Which states had Dem trifectas in 2009 that Obama could bully? Why would Dems bother when everyone would redraw the lines after 2010?
Which states had Dem trifectas in 2009 that Obama could bully? Why would Dems bother when everyone would redraw the lines after 2010?
Texas Tribune says Dems had a chance to hold onto existing seats, but there was no risk to current GOP districts
www.texastribune.org/2025/07/31/t...
Texas Tribune says Dems had a chance to hold onto existing seats, but there was no risk to current GOP districts
www.texastribune.org/2025/07/31/t...
Trump doesn't have the power to do it now because states draw districts, and is struggling to convince them (see Indiana).
Where could Obama have put pressure to redistrict?
And if all maps were redrawn after the 2010 census anyway, what's the point?
Trump doesn't have the power to do it now because states draw districts, and is struggling to convince them (see Indiana).
Where could Obama have put pressure to redistrict?
And if all maps were redrawn after the 2010 census anyway, what's the point?
Also, some say indictment text for one charge still references the now removed no-bill charge (aka they didn’t rewrite it) so whole thing is a clusterfuck.
Also, some say indictment text for one charge still references the now removed no-bill charge (aka they didn’t rewrite it) so whole thing is a clusterfuck.
It doesn't make up for everything else, but it's something.
It doesn't make up for everything else, but it's something.
But it's a bad combo if you piss off voters AND don't gerrymander everyone into a safe seat
But it's a bad combo if you piss off voters AND don't gerrymander everyone into a safe seat
Ever looked into what ratio of the two is most predictive of future performance?
Ever looked into what ratio of the two is most predictive of future performance?
He said he opposed the Iraq War
He complained that Washington politics was a mess (which is more populist than moderate, but similar)
Overall he said a bunch of non-conservative stuff, and was light on all of the details, and got away with all of it.
He said he opposed the Iraq War
He complained that Washington politics was a mess (which is more populist than moderate, but similar)
Overall he said a bunch of non-conservative stuff, and was light on all of the details, and got away with all of it.
He promised to protect Medicare and SS, plus a healthcare plan that would be better than Obamacare
He claimed he would cut taxes and close loopholes in a way that makes the rich (including himself) pay more on net
He promised to protect Medicare and SS, plus a healthcare plan that would be better than Obamacare
He claimed he would cut taxes and close loopholes in a way that makes the rich (including himself) pay more on net
1. If conservative voters in red states, then Dems should run Manchin types as a mod Dem is better than right wing GOP.
2. If voting issues no need to moderate. Purity on abortion, climate, immigration etc
1. If conservative voters in red states, then Dems should run Manchin types as a mod Dem is better than right wing GOP.
2. If voting issues no need to moderate. Purity on abortion, climate, immigration etc
All agree it’s Democrats fault for avoiding the hard work of (persuading conservatives to vote for Dems OR ending voting rights abuses)
All agree it’s Democrats fault for avoiding the hard work of (persuading conservatives to vote for Dems OR ending voting rights abuses)