Tom Hill
banner
tomhill.bsky.social
Tom Hill
@tomhill.bsky.social
Environmental economist | Stoicism | Wildlife Gardening | Deliberative democracy | Aspiring Hiccup | 🏳️‍🌈 (he/him) |
No, I think all earners. I was referencing here but have looked at the underlying data too before.

Absent inherited wealth, working age people across the board in the UK have been very hit hard since the financial crisis. Older gens fared much better.

www.starlingbank.com/blog/average...
Average Salary UK: Full Breakdown by Age & Region | Starling
What is the average salary in the UK? We break it down by age and region and examine how the taboo surrounding salaries relates to ‘money dysmorphia’.
www.starlingbank.com
November 21, 2025 at 8:52 AM
I think you're confusing the top 10% with the top 1% and top 0.1%.

If you're earning in the region of £70k then you're in the top 10% of earners, which will include a much greater proportion of 40 to 50 year old, purely as a function of peak earnings. Many of those will have mega mortgages.
November 21, 2025 at 8:05 AM
Elon Musk is a bit overlooked? I didn't realise that AI could get drunk.
November 20, 2025 at 9:59 PM
Where is it being directed from then? Doesn't feel like Starmer?
November 18, 2025 at 11:09 PM
Reposted by Tom Hill
A lot of it is stuff Cooper refused to do, which is why she was moved, but yeah the detailed policy work hasn't been done.
November 18, 2025 at 10:27 AM
Is this how the political betting got started?
November 18, 2025 at 6:46 AM
Streeting is already beginning to work that line: calling for Rayner's return, saying that he's sorry that he's offended trans people etc.
November 15, 2025 at 5:04 PM
Reposted by Tom Hill
My pet theory is if they actually gave up on winning and Governed like they at 3.5 years to accomplish everything they ever can in politics that they'd actually be *more* likely to win the next election.
November 15, 2025 at 10:30 AM
Reposted by Tom Hill
If I seem disappointed with this government it's not because I think the one before was way better. It wasn't at all good. It's because we need this one to be way better than that one. Because the next one could be way worse
November 15, 2025 at 12:54 PM
Piss poor joke that @judithfreedman.bsky.social.
November 14, 2025 at 12:38 AM
Thanks for responding. Significant but by no means game-changing then.
November 14, 2025 at 12:32 AM
@stephenkb.bsky.social, has anyone modelled how much effectively removing salary sacrifice - i.e. allowing people to claim income tax back but not employer or employee NI - would yield?
November 13, 2025 at 11:58 PM
An interesting point. Wouldn't GDP theoretically rise exponentially in that case until crashing completely when the last person died?
November 7, 2025 at 3:43 PM
Core vote targeting innit?
October 28, 2025 at 8:28 PM
Because of the way repayments are structured they grow disproportionately as your earnings increase. When you're on £30k to £40k repayments are £250 to £1200(ish) but when you get to £90k they'd be £5.5k(ish).

A lot when you're juggling big mortgages, childcare etc.
October 28, 2025 at 8:17 PM
Another thought @robertwoolley.bsky.social is that this is another political bomb coming down the track. In ten years time, when the post 94s you mention are 40 and starting to reach peak earnings (& debt) many are likely to be paying very sig proportion of their disposable income on student loans.
October 28, 2025 at 8:12 PM
Yeah, so an Orange Book/One Nation/YIMBY pitch that way could gain traction beyond current electoral coalitions? I'm not close to it, but got the vibe that that was what Pierre Poilievre was doing in the States before Trump trashed him (albeit with more reactionary elements).
October 28, 2025 at 1:01 PM
Hmm maybe. I guess it depends on where the votes split between @benansell.bsky.social' 'whose younger, graduate, professional voters are now the ones paying much higher marginal rates.' and @georgeeaton.bsky.social's point about most of the tax coming from the top 10%...
October 28, 2025 at 12:56 PM