David Hood
@thoughtfulnz.bsky.social
I like collating data,
and getting thoughts in the brain.
I run https://thoughtfulnz.quarto.pub/nzcovidreport/
All for Public data, Aotearoa New Zealand, and informed communities. #openData #NewZealand #Aotearoa #rstats. He/him.
He tangata tiriti ahau
and getting thoughts in the brain.
I run https://thoughtfulnz.quarto.pub/nzcovidreport/
All for Public data, Aotearoa New Zealand, and informed communities. #openData #NewZealand #Aotearoa #rstats. He/him.
He tangata tiriti ahau
I suspect there may also be some sea level rise and storm surge maps for day 12 a map from 2125.
November 11, 2025 at 4:56 AM
I suspect there may also be some sea level rise and storm surge maps for day 12 a map from 2125.
It is a very specific imitation hand drawn style, but there is the xkcd package.
November 10, 2025 at 8:33 PM
It is a very specific imitation hand drawn style, but there is the xkcd package.
For four, my inclination is to use two to mark the North Island edges rather than centreline.
November 10, 2025 at 6:17 PM
For four, my inclination is to use two to mark the North Island edges rather than centreline.
Some (at least one but I forget if there were others) are dead. So not currently reoffending.
November 10, 2025 at 1:52 AM
Some (at least one but I forget if there were others) are dead. So not currently reoffending.
Reposted by David Hood
NZ
If it's flat it was a swamp
If it's hilly it's a volcano
If there are cliffs it's a fault line
If it's flat it was a swamp
If it's hilly it's a volcano
If there are cliffs it's a fault line
November 9, 2025 at 8:45 PM
NZ
If it's flat it was a swamp
If it's hilly it's a volcano
If there are cliffs it's a fault line
If it's flat it was a swamp
If it's hilly it's a volcano
If there are cliffs it's a fault line
But where this is coming from is that it is not enough just to respond with facts, because that doesn't affect the production and consumption of more bullshit amount the same people, so a response needs to explicitly frame both the accuracy (proven) AND motive of sources.
November 9, 2025 at 8:09 PM
But where this is coming from is that it is not enough just to respond with facts, because that doesn't affect the production and consumption of more bullshit amount the same people, so a response needs to explicitly frame both the accuracy (proven) AND motive of sources.
Where I am, I'm favour of directly calling out the values framing misinformation, to use the disjoint from reality as lever to draw attention to motives. For instance, recently right wing politicians here expressed imported concern about fertility rates (great replacement theory adjacent concerns)
November 9, 2025 at 8:09 PM
Where I am, I'm favour of directly calling out the values framing misinformation, to use the disjoint from reality as lever to draw attention to motives. For instance, recently right wing politicians here expressed imported concern about fertility rates (great replacement theory adjacent concerns)
