In a new preprint, @zachhensel.bsky.social and I analyze early COVID-19 cases sequence data that have been overlooked so far.
These new data continue to point to a natural origin ▫️1/7
doi.org/10.1101/2025...
In a new preprint, @zachhensel.bsky.social and I analyze early COVID-19 cases sequence data that have been overlooked so far.
These new data continue to point to a natural origin ▫️1/7
doi.org/10.1101/2025...
Bluesky = knowledge sector workers who have it open all day in a tab next to their emails. “Wait what was I doing again?”
Threads = normies watching recipe videos on the commute.
Bluesky = knowledge sector workers who have it open all day in a tab next to their emails. “Wait what was I doing again?”
Threads = normies watching recipe videos on the commute.
#AcademicSky 🧪
#AcademicSky 🧪
Firstly, John does great analysis, and there's obviously a trend for Bluesky here. It's reportedly more than doubled in size overnight, which is huge.
Also, these numbers are clearly not accurate, despite SimilarWeb's assurances.
Firstly, John does great analysis, and there's obviously a trend for Bluesky here. It's reportedly more than doubled in size overnight, which is huge.
Also, these numbers are clearly not accurate, despite SimilarWeb's assurances.
In Dr. Chan's @nytimes.com OpEd there is, however, a very specific hypothesis for COVID-19 origin.
It's a prime example of conspiracism vs empiricism, so let's dive in.
🧵
The article itself contains multiple falsehoods and deep mischaracterizations.
Let's take every point in turn 👇🧵
www.nytimes.com/interactive/...
In Dr. Chan's @nytimes.com OpEd there is, however, a very specific hypothesis for COVID-19 origin.
It's a prime example of conspiracism vs empiricism, so let's dive in.
🧵