@theotheories.bsky.social
There aren't very many of us it doesn't matter what the adverse impacts on us are, 10/10 "human rights charity"
November 6, 2025 at 10:45 AM
There aren't very many of us it doesn't matter what the adverse impacts on us are, 10/10 "human rights charity"
So I take from this that if I'm treated in any way that is different from cis women while using a women's toilet (like being asked to provide evidence of birth sex or ID) that this is direct gender reassignment discrimination? In the view of the EHRC?
October 14, 2025 at 6:54 PM
So I take from this that if I'm treated in any way that is different from cis women while using a women's toilet (like being asked to provide evidence of birth sex or ID) that this is direct gender reassignment discrimination? In the view of the EHRC?
Kelly Vs Santa?
Do any other employers have a "naughty list"?
Do any other employers have a "naughty list"?
October 2, 2025 at 4:03 PM
Kelly Vs Santa?
Do any other employers have a "naughty list"?
Do any other employers have a "naughty list"?
The article seems to have absolutely no idea what's happening but I'm assuming this is going to be related to supreme court/EHRC stuff. Assuming a lot of stuff in the military is split by sex, and plenty of it won't have a disabled toilet "third space" because you can't join if disabled
September 24, 2025 at 11:04 PM
The article seems to have absolutely no idea what's happening but I'm assuming this is going to be related to supreme court/EHRC stuff. Assuming a lot of stuff in the military is split by sex, and plenty of it won't have a disabled toilet "third space" because you can't join if disabled
This specific guy's previous hits
September 20, 2025 at 10:20 AM
This specific guy's previous hits
Making a ruling that will have massive impacts on a thing without hearing arguments on it seems like a recipe for "oops we said human rights violations were compulsory"
Like is it not their job to notice things like "this will interact with other legislation/rules eg. Single sex wards in the NHS"
Like is it not their job to notice things like "this will interact with other legislation/rules eg. Single sex wards in the NHS"
September 13, 2025 at 6:39 PM
Making a ruling that will have massive impacts on a thing without hearing arguments on it seems like a recipe for "oops we said human rights violations were compulsory"
Like is it not their job to notice things like "this will interact with other legislation/rules eg. Single sex wards in the NHS"
Like is it not their job to notice things like "this will interact with other legislation/rules eg. Single sex wards in the NHS"
Supreme court judge here basically saying that yes he knows this wasn't what parliament meant, but the supreme court can decide that it's what the law says, even if it has to torture phrases like "physiological or other characteristics of sex" to do it
September 13, 2025 at 6:30 PM
Supreme court judge here basically saying that yes he knows this wasn't what parliament meant, but the supreme court can decide that it's what the law says, even if it has to torture phrases like "physiological or other characteristics of sex" to do it
Wait this? I was reading it as applying to members, not pre membership. If you're a currently competing member then yeah doping rules are usually get certification first then start. Is this definitely distinct and applied retroactively?
September 4, 2025 at 4:51 PM
Wait this? I was reading it as applying to members, not pre membership. If you're a currently competing member then yeah doping rules are usually get certification first then start. Is this definitely distinct and applied retroactively?
Clearly telling people to punch trans women
September 2, 2025 at 5:02 PM
Clearly telling people to punch trans women
The whole point of the "proportionate means to a legitimate aim" thing was to give services the ability to make flexible and proportionate decisions on individual situations.
August 19, 2025 at 2:06 PM
The whole point of the "proportionate means to a legitimate aim" thing was to give services the ability to make flexible and proportionate decisions on individual situations.
It was not limited! Was it supposed to be? This "implications for lesbians" section in lgb alliance sub seems to be about the impact, not the statutory interpretation issues. They were allowed to argue about the impact on their access to services and their human rights, and trans people were not.
August 18, 2025 at 10:12 AM
It was not limited! Was it supposed to be? This "implications for lesbians" section in lgb alliance sub seems to be about the impact, not the statutory interpretation issues. They were allowed to argue about the impact on their access to services and their human rights, and trans people were not.
I love getting cyber security training with spinny autoplay video above every single video
August 14, 2025 at 4:12 PM
I love getting cyber security training with spinny autoplay video above every single video
There's an obvious hole in this argument, if the "safe space" for ministers and officials to draft policy includes external groups it's not a self contained safe space safe from outside interference. We should be able to see what external groups are arguing for!
August 6, 2025 at 2:09 PM
There's an obvious hole in this argument, if the "safe space" for ministers and officials to draft policy includes external groups it's not a self contained safe space safe from outside interference. We should be able to see what external groups are arguing for!
The telegraph obviously hid it right at the bottom but the comment they've made is "everyone works everywhere, we are inclusive, ask to speak to someone else if you have a problem with someone"
August 5, 2025 at 7:16 PM
The telegraph obviously hid it right at the bottom but the comment they've made is "everyone works everywhere, we are inclusive, ask to speak to someone else if you have a problem with someone"
"truly sorry it didn't go as you hoped" and "we regret the distress" are not apologising for the incident or their policy. Telegraph is spinning as hard as possible
August 5, 2025 at 7:12 PM
"truly sorry it didn't go as you hoped" and "we regret the distress" are not apologising for the incident or their policy. Telegraph is spinning as hard as possible
Study English and Chiedcare
August 5, 2025 at 8:27 AM
Study English and Chiedcare
He's also received extremely detailed advice from the Leeds GIC I'm actually on the waiting list for, saying this is safe to prescribe in the long term.
August 3, 2025 at 3:05 PM
He's also received extremely detailed advice from the Leeds GIC I'm actually on the waiting list for, saying this is safe to prescribe in the long term.
Then he got a letter from the consultant endo who prescribed my T, saying please prescribe.
August 3, 2025 at 3:05 PM
Then he got a letter from the consultant endo who prescribed my T, saying please prescribe.
Then he wrote to the local GIC. A specialist GP wrote back to say it was safe and there is no evidence of an increased risk of endometrial cancer.
August 3, 2025 at 3:05 PM
Then he wrote to the local GIC. A specialist GP wrote back to say it was safe and there is no evidence of an increased risk of endometrial cancer.
First he got a letter from a GUM consultant, at an appointment where she was being supervised by a GIC GP. They both thought it was fine!
He refused to prescribe.
He refused to prescribe.
August 3, 2025 at 3:05 PM
First he got a letter from a GUM consultant, at an appointment where she was being supervised by a GIC GP. They both thought it was fine!
He refused to prescribe.
He refused to prescribe.
My workplace has installed Roman style public toilets, and my only concern is, what if the colleague I'm making eye contact with while shitting is trans?
July 14, 2025 at 3:31 PM
My workplace has installed Roman style public toilets, and my only concern is, what if the colleague I'm making eye contact with while shitting is trans?
With alt text
April 26, 2025 at 4:38 PM
With alt text
And the thing about not having no facilities is a "should" not a "must" so it is permissible (although advised against) to have no toilet trans people are allowed to use
April 26, 2025 at 9:58 AM
And the thing about not having no facilities is a "should" not a "must" so it is permissible (although advised against) to have no toilet trans people are allowed to use
They are fucking BANNING trans inclusive freedom of association what the actual FUCK
April 25, 2025 at 9:12 PM
They are fucking BANNING trans inclusive freedom of association what the actual FUCK