It is an outrageous order that no other litigant could hope to get, destroying a critical funding stream that saves lives. We’ll see if the court can somehow save its credibility. I doubt it.
February 27, 2025 at 2:36 AM
It is an outrageous order that no other litigant could hope to get, destroying a critical funding stream that saves lives. We’ll see if the court can somehow save its credibility. I doubt it.
Won’t be watching the inauguration (anything else I can find to do is preferable), sorry for the bad ratings. But will absolutely be with you in the p.m.!!!!
January 19, 2025 at 4:33 AM
Won’t be watching the inauguration (anything else I can find to do is preferable), sorry for the bad ratings. But will absolutely be with you in the p.m.!!!!
It is not only that Trump got 4 votes, but the stated reason for allowing the sentencing to go forward is that it wouldn't take much time, won't lead to jail, and isn't too inconvenient. SCOTUS did everything but offer to validate his parking and buy hm lunch.
January 10, 2025 at 12:34 AM
It is not only that Trump got 4 votes, but the stated reason for allowing the sentencing to go forward is that it wouldn't take much time, won't lead to jail, and isn't too inconvenient. SCOTUS did everything but offer to validate his parking and buy hm lunch.