tea
@teahunting.bsky.social
30 | she/they | politics and eurotrash
Reposted by tea
So he has absolutely no clue what an LLM is or how it works.
It isn't that gen AI only plagiarises if it's "misused", it's that they can do no other. They don't create they can only possibly generate based on other people's works, and for the scale of library needed it has to be scraped; stolen.
It isn't that gen AI only plagiarises if it's "misused", it's that they can do no other. They don't create they can only possibly generate based on other people's works, and for the scale of library needed it has to be scraped; stolen.
December 28, 2025 at 4:03 AM
So he has absolutely no clue what an LLM is or how it works.
It isn't that gen AI only plagiarises if it's "misused", it's that they can do no other. They don't create they can only possibly generate based on other people's works, and for the scale of library needed it has to be scraped; stolen.
It isn't that gen AI only plagiarises if it's "misused", it's that they can do no other. They don't create they can only possibly generate based on other people's works, and for the scale of library needed it has to be scraped; stolen.
Reposted by tea
GenAI isn't synonymous with plagiarism because of how it's *used*, it's synonymous with plagiarism because of what it *is*, how it *works*. GenAI is plagiarism because it can do no other. It cannot work without a massive body of works to smoosh together, for too much to license it all with honesty.
December 28, 2025 at 4:03 AM
GenAI isn't synonymous with plagiarism because of how it's *used*, it's synonymous with plagiarism because of what it *is*, how it *works*. GenAI is plagiarism because it can do no other. It cannot work without a massive body of works to smoosh together, for too much to license it all with honesty.
Reposted by tea
