Am I reading this wrong or does the lede to this article state the opposite of what his paper argued: "he won an award for a paper arguing the Constitution only protects non-whites."

Didn't his paper say the constitution only protects white Americans?

Taking the advice of these wise scholars of fascism and relocating my family from one elite enclave to another

There are also chats and discords with tons of people all using aliases which means you often don’t really know who you’re talking to and people feel they can say whatever they want and it’s secure. Is this security or we just larping?

The whole point of a march or a protest is taking some level of risk (very little in the case of most marches, which are police-sanctioned and escorted) to make a public-facing political statement.

The EIC ran a letter in response defending the need for "fact-based information" and noting that this data is in the public record, which does not suggest they are going to do any better.

Two poisonous men who both have absolute shit for brains talking about how social security is a scam and they want to fuck robots and what will the robots genitals be like and NYT is like, in a freewheeling and unconventional conversation...

"I'm just going to leave this here, do what you want with it" isolates this list of targets from any sense of values, right and wrong, or potential consequences.

This could have been a call on foundations to defend their values, for example, but instead reads like a how-to guide for the trump administration complete with a searchable list (!).