What makes it hell? Just out of curiosity

youtu.be/oX_yA8aVwIA?...

Gotta be mini Ranni - it felt almost like the first time in a souls game that a main character was just allowed to chat for a bit, tell you wtf they’re up to. She even gets annoyed at herself for being too transparent and personable, it’s such a memorable moment for me

That’d be a good bit to announce on every flight

Followed because I thought you were the other Justin McElroy.
Stayed because this shit is great

Maybe the most worthless thought that’s ever been shared

Pick up. Start over. Greener pastures lie beyond. Hit this joint first.

The only core American desire is to want to be a baby again

Fair enough, but the information’s always (?) there if you ever get a sense that shit isn’t adding up.

Hell, listening to Mike Pence’s opinion won’t kill you. Folks don’t talk about how central Pence was.
he was pressured to break his oath and then cornered in the Capitol building

Don’t get me wrong, I didn’t get into the appendix or anything. The indictment and the Eastman memo sold me well enough; it’s so much evidence from public figures and records like emails, it’s pretty concrete stuff

Then unfortunately I can only say that you’re uninformed and arguing from an ignorant viewpoint, I’m sorry.
I know everyone’s fighting here but I’m trying to share knowledge here. This is public information you and I are lucky enough to have the freedom to read, so why not read it?

Idk man, if you’re arguing in good faith, this is the kind of stuff you need to contend with. I’m not talking about Comey, I’m arguing against your belief that the DOJ was weaponized against Trump and offering information that counters your claim

The reason I’m pushing this so hard is because your argument for Trump’s weaponized DOJ being justified hinges on the indictment against HIM being unjustified. And it’s very difficult to argue against the evidence in the Jack Smith indictment.

Again, I highly, highly recommend reading the Jack Smith indictment. A fair amount of info enclosed is not very public knowledge.
The most insidious part imo is that DT claimed election fraud / interference to smokescreen his OWN fraud/interference.

To be clear, you don’t believe DT should have been indicted for his actions after the 2020 election?
Do you believe he is above the law?

Serious questions, I want to understand where you’re coming from

if cross-checking the validity of the evidence still doesn’t change your mind, I recommend reflecting on how your own biases might be affecting your viewpoint.
I know that if Biden, who I voted for, was caught doing this shit, I’d want for him to be indicted and tried for anti-democratic behavior