I'm wouldn't be surprised if this idea came from a singular article or tweet. These people base their reality around what a single non-influentual person has said. Gamergate grifters used to that a lot, and plenty like them still do.

Endy has zero idea what he is talking about even when he is talking about his own side lol. We are in an age where CEOs are literally boomers who get impressed with whatever they see online.

Well the claim is wrong, the best estimates for IQ heritability are probably 30% or less, the insinuation is wrong, the technical meaning of heritability is not the same thing as “how genetic something is”, and the fundamental idea behind the product is wrong.

He is everything gamers™ are and want to be: a disgusting person who dehumanizes minorities, plays games all day, doesn’t shower, is rich, and can’t be held accountable by anyone. This is their wet dream right there.

Also, this person is not healed from her 4chan days AT ALL, I wouldn't recommend subscribing as a pivot to grifting can still happen

Honestly, has complaining about moderation on Steam ever worked? Not that we shouldn't try it, but it's I think they never go back on a decision after they cut off communication like they did in that report

Send people "back" so they can bomb them like they are doing with the Venezuelans, right?