To spell this out— even in a world where this manufactured armed conflict is real, even if the drugs were a military objective, *even if* the 11 non-combatants were acceptable collateral damage, they were never engaged in “hostile acts.” Not before they were hit. And not when they called for help.
The U.S. military could try to kill shipwrecked survivors if "they took what the United States deemed to be a hostile action, like communicating with suspected cartel members."
December 4, 2025 at 4:04 AM
To spell this out— even in a world where this manufactured armed conflict is real, even if the drugs were a military objective, *even if* the 11 non-combatants were acceptable collateral damage, they were never engaged in “hostile acts.” Not before they were hit. And not when they called for help.
I have yet to finish reading in detail, but as a preliminary thought, I'm happy to see that the new version expands more upon cyber-enabled gender-based violence and the rights of the accused than the previous draft.
December 3, 2025 at 1:43 PM
I have yet to finish reading in detail, but as a preliminary thought, I'm happy to see that the new version expands more upon cyber-enabled gender-based violence and the rights of the accused than the previous draft.
Yesterday, loyalist bands, the far-right and Israeli flag wavers stood shoulder to shoulder in Belfast City Centre in a demonstration of extremism in the North. Discriminatory policing didn't start at Palestine solidarity, PSNI 'policing' of far-right is non-existent by design. [4/n]
Yesterday, loyalist bands, the far-right and Israeli flag wavers stood shoulder to shoulder in Belfast City Centre in a demonstration of extremism in the North. Discriminatory policing didn't start at Palestine solidarity, PSNI 'policing' of far-right is non-existent by design. [4/n]