Trump is now dismantling the regulatory system that created that market.
Musk isn’t aligned with Trump by choice. He’s economically bonded.
Credit Where It’s Due
www.linkedin.com/pulse/credit...
#tesla #trump
Trump is now dismantling the regulatory system that created that market.
Musk isn’t aligned with Trump by choice. He’s economically bonded.
Credit Where It’s Due
www.linkedin.com/pulse/credit...
#tesla #trump
New poll:
“America would be better off if more people worked in manufacturing.”
• 80% of Americans agree
• 20% disagree
“I would be better off if I worked in a factory.”
• 25% of Americans agree
• 73% disagree
• 2% currently work in a factory
New poll:
“America would be better off if more people worked in manufacturing.”
• 80% of Americans agree
• 20% disagree
“I would be better off if I worked in a factory.”
• 25% of Americans agree
• 73% disagree
• 2% currently work in a factory
[10/10]
What’s coming isn’t artificial general intelligence—it’s the moment when we can no longer tell the difference between real and simulated intelligence.
This is when singularity has arrived.
#AI #AGI #MachineLearning #ArtificialIntelligence #TechEthics
[10/10]
What’s coming isn’t artificial general intelligence—it’s the moment when we can no longer tell the difference between real and simulated intelligence.
This is when singularity has arrived.
#AI #AGI #MachineLearning #ArtificialIntelligence #TechEthics
[9/10]
The real danger from AI is not AGI.
In 5-10 years we will simulate human intelligence so convincingly that humans will no longer emotionally be able to distinguish between what is real and what is not.
#AI #AGI #MachineLearning #ArtificialIntelligence #TechEthics
[9/10]
The real danger from AI is not AGI.
In 5-10 years we will simulate human intelligence so convincingly that humans will no longer emotionally be able to distinguish between what is real and what is not.
#AI #AGI #MachineLearning #ArtificialIntelligence #TechEthics
[8/10]
We will no longer be able to distinguish what is real and what is not.
Engaging with charismatic human simulations, means the boundary between real and mediated realities breaks down.
#AI #AGI #MachineLearning #ArtificialIntelligence #TechEthics
[8/10]
We will no longer be able to distinguish what is real and what is not.
Engaging with charismatic human simulations, means the boundary between real and mediated realities breaks down.
#AI #AGI #MachineLearning #ArtificialIntelligence #TechEthics
[7/10]
These simulations will almost certainly be deployed by bad faith actors.
Imagine a digitally recreated historical figure endorsing an extremist agenda.
We have no real emotional defense against this.
#AI #AGI #MachineLearning #ArtificialIntelligence #TechEthics
[7/10]
These simulations will almost certainly be deployed by bad faith actors.
Imagine a digitally recreated historical figure endorsing an extremist agenda.
We have no real emotional defense against this.
#AI #AGI #MachineLearning #ArtificialIntelligence #TechEthics
[6/10]
We will almost certainly be able to simulate historical figures as interactive digital agents—trained on their records.
You’ll likely be able to talk to an Einstein or even deceased relatives.
#AI #AGI #MachineLearning #ArtificialIntelligence #TechEthics
[6/10]
We will almost certainly be able to simulate historical figures as interactive digital agents—trained on their records.
You’ll likely be able to talk to an Einstein or even deceased relatives.
#AI #AGI #MachineLearning #ArtificialIntelligence #TechEthics
[5/10]
The capacity to simulate human intelligence is the biggest systemic risk AI poses.
In the digital realm, we will not be able to tell the difference between a real human being and a simulated one.
#AI #AGI #MachineLearning #ArtificialIntelligence #TechEthics
[5/10]
The capacity to simulate human intelligence is the biggest systemic risk AI poses.
In the digital realm, we will not be able to tell the difference between a real human being and a simulated one.
#AI #AGI #MachineLearning #ArtificialIntelligence #TechEthics
[4/10]
While LLMs cannot produce AGI, they can simulate human intelligence to the point where we can no longer distinguish between real and artificial humans. This is the real risk.
#AI #AGI #MachineLearning #ArtificialIntelligence #TechEthics
[4/10]
While LLMs cannot produce AGI, they can simulate human intelligence to the point where we can no longer distinguish between real and artificial humans. This is the real risk.
#AI #AGI #MachineLearning #ArtificialIntelligence #TechEthics
[3/10]
AGI can never be built from LLMs, regardless of processor arrays deployed.
These systems lack understanding, intentionality, and consciousness.
They generate plausible outputs from patterns—not meaning.
#AI #AGI #MachineLearning #ArtificialIntelligence #TechEthics
[3/10]
AGI can never be built from LLMs, regardless of processor arrays deployed.
These systems lack understanding, intentionality, and consciousness.
They generate plausible outputs from patterns—not meaning.
#AI #AGI #MachineLearning #ArtificialIntelligence #TechEthics
[2/10]
Human intelligence is non-deterministic.
It unfolds through context, embodiment, and lived experience.
Current AI systems are deterministic and statistical—fundamentally different in nature.
#AI #AGI #MachineLearning #ArtificialIntelligence #TechEthics
[2/10]
Human intelligence is non-deterministic.
It unfolds through context, embodiment, and lived experience.
Current AI systems are deterministic and statistical—fundamentally different in nature.
#AI #AGI #MachineLearning #ArtificialIntelligence #TechEthics
[1/10]
We don’t clearly understand what human intelligence is.
We lack a comprehensive phenomenological account of how it emerges and operates.
Without that, attempts to replicate it remain speculative.
#AI #AGI #MachineLearning #ArtificialIntelligence #TechEthics
[1/10]
We don’t clearly understand what human intelligence is.
We lack a comprehensive phenomenological account of how it emerges and operates.
Without that, attempts to replicate it remain speculative.
#AI #AGI #MachineLearning #ArtificialIntelligence #TechEthics
The coverage is treating the book as an expose of Meta culture and execs and while it is that, I think the more interesting parts are in between and focus on global power dynamics 1/
The coverage is treating the book as an expose of Meta culture and execs and while it is that, I think the more interesting parts are in between and focus on global power dynamics 1/