Clive Evans
@swishbob.bsky.social
There's always time for lube ...
December 2, 2025 at 3:07 PM
There's always time for lube ...
And not just because some people would misuse it horrifically.
November 29, 2025 at 4:27 PM
And not just because some people would misuse it horrifically.
I assumed you were referring to him as a bug man, which I can't see him disagreeing with, tbh.
November 29, 2025 at 4:27 PM
I assumed you were referring to him as a bug man, which I can't see him disagreeing with, tbh.
I mean, would you send an expensive robot filled with snacks around South London?
November 28, 2025 at 3:39 PM
I mean, would you send an expensive robot filled with snacks around South London?
Not if the frequency of them getting confused is anything to go by. I am confused by the number of people who're unaware that they've been a thing in the UK for the best part of a decade, mind.
November 28, 2025 at 3:27 PM
Not if the frequency of them getting confused is anything to go by. I am confused by the number of people who're unaware that they've been a thing in the UK for the best part of a decade, mind.
That's Numberwang!
November 25, 2025 at 6:25 PM
That's Numberwang!
I really rate my JBL Live Pro 2. So much better than the stupidly expensive Sony ones I had before them.
November 25, 2025 at 9:45 AM
I really rate my JBL Live Pro 2. So much better than the stupidly expensive Sony ones I had before them.
It kind of is. It means that orders are presumed to be lawful, ie: the burden of proof that they are not is on the defendant if (and when) they are charged with not obeying an order.
It does not mean what the fascists are saying it does though. Unlawful orders are still unlawful.
It does not mean what the fascists are saying it does though. Unlawful orders are still unlawful.
November 24, 2025 at 7:02 PM
It kind of is. It means that orders are presumed to be lawful, ie: the burden of proof that they are not is on the defendant if (and when) they are charged with not obeying an order.
It does not mean what the fascists are saying it does though. Unlawful orders are still unlawful.
It does not mean what the fascists are saying it does though. Unlawful orders are still unlawful.
Maybe. There is a non-trivial number of Americans who'd support literally anybody if they invaded some South American/Commie country (delete as appropriate). They could be inflating the Trump numbers. Maybe.
November 24, 2025 at 5:12 PM
Maybe. There is a non-trivial number of Americans who'd support literally anybody if they invaded some South American/Commie country (delete as appropriate). They could be inflating the Trump numbers. Maybe.
You were legitimately expecting him to do this? But you already have boys, you know how this works!
November 18, 2025 at 11:53 AM
You were legitimately expecting him to do this? But you already have boys, you know how this works!
Personally, I think it's him (Epstein's brother) using hyperbole to ask what kompromat Putin has, but ...
November 16, 2025 at 11:31 AM
Personally, I think it's him (Epstein's brother) using hyperbole to ask what kompromat Putin has, but ...
One of the emails seems to imply Trump sucked somebody off, possibly Clinton.
November 16, 2025 at 11:26 AM
One of the emails seems to imply Trump sucked somebody off, possibly Clinton.
Look, unless you've tried it, how do you know what Bubba tastes like?
November 16, 2025 at 12:16 AM
Look, unless you've tried it, how do you know what Bubba tastes like?
I mean, he's dead so we don't go on about it much, but bring him up in conversation in the UK. Trust me, we won't hold back.
November 14, 2025 at 2:47 PM
I mean, he's dead so we don't go on about it much, but bring him up in conversation in the UK. Trust me, we won't hold back.
Look, it's not his fault. He comes from a long line of racists. It's literally in his blood. This is what his people have always done. You can't expect him to act civilly, it's his heritage.
Etc.
Etc.
November 13, 2025 at 3:46 PM
Look, it's not his fault. He comes from a long line of racists. It's literally in his blood. This is what his people have always done. You can't expect him to act civilly, it's his heritage.
Etc.
Etc.
Damnit, I thought this was you telling us the next part was out. (Ok, so I've read it before, I know the story, but still ...)
November 13, 2025 at 3:45 PM
Damnit, I thought this was you telling us the next part was out. (Ok, so I've read it before, I know the story, but still ...)
Pure filth. Would subscribe to your ekranpolan themed newsletter.
November 13, 2025 at 3:42 PM
Pure filth. Would subscribe to your ekranpolan themed newsletter.
How would we know though, we never see his dice rolls.
November 13, 2025 at 11:35 AM
How would we know though, we never see his dice rolls.
The article pretty much says the opposite to the summary:
"nothing is off the table" when it comes to protecting children online, though she acknowledged there are "no current plans to ban the use of VPNs"
"nothing is off the table" when it comes to protecting children online, though she acknowledged there are "no current plans to ban the use of VPNs"
November 12, 2025 at 4:58 PM
The article pretty much says the opposite to the summary:
"nothing is off the table" when it comes to protecting children online, though she acknowledged there are "no current plans to ban the use of VPNs"
"nothing is off the table" when it comes to protecting children online, though she acknowledged there are "no current plans to ban the use of VPNs"
You've said `Culture` twice
November 11, 2025 at 1:02 PM
You've said `Culture` twice