Thomas Svensson
@svthom.bsky.social
Reposted by Thomas Svensson
"potentially replaced by AI-based computational models of toxicity and cell lines and organoid toxicity testing"
#whatcouldpossiblygowrong 🤦♂️
#whatcouldpossiblygowrong 🤦♂️
April 11, 2025 at 7:45 AM
"potentially replaced by AI-based computational models of toxicity and cell lines and organoid toxicity testing"
#whatcouldpossiblygowrong 🤦♂️
#whatcouldpossiblygowrong 🤦♂️
Reposted by Thomas Svensson
From @shahanmemon.bsky.social , a truly bananas story about a recent paper advocating for peer review by AI agents instead of peers.
If that strikes you as a viewpoint that only an AI could endorse, read on...
If that strikes you as a viewpoint that only an AI could endorse, read on...
🚨 I recently came across a weird case of #AI in #preprints, with implications for burdening #SciComm with AI-mediated #PredatoryPublishing
What did I find? Issues with the article, questionable behavior by the author, indexing problems, and AI's potential for streamlining predatory publishing.
🧵
What did I find? Issues with the article, questionable behavior by the author, indexing problems, and AI's potential for streamlining predatory publishing.
🧵
November 29, 2024 at 6:45 AM
From @shahanmemon.bsky.social , a truly bananas story about a recent paper advocating for peer review by AI agents instead of peers.
If that strikes you as a viewpoint that only an AI could endorse, read on...
If that strikes you as a viewpoint that only an AI could endorse, read on...