Reposted by surrogatekey
There is also one more important harm: reputational and trust harms to science.
Research ethics controversies hurt research overall. They decrease trust in ethics review. And in this case decrease redditors' trusts of researchers, likely influencing willingness to participate in consented research.
Research ethics controversies hurt research overall. They decrease trust in ethics review. And in this case decrease redditors' trusts of researchers, likely influencing willingness to participate in consented research.
April 26, 2025 at 10:49 PM
There is also one more important harm: reputational and trust harms to science.
Research ethics controversies hurt research overall. They decrease trust in ethics review. And in this case decrease redditors' trusts of researchers, likely influencing willingness to participate in consented research.
Research ethics controversies hurt research overall. They decrease trust in ethics review. And in this case decrease redditors' trusts of researchers, likely influencing willingness to participate in consented research.
Great piece.
I'm wondering if there's any more info about their immigration status that could be shared. Just trying to get a sense of what "in the U.S. illegally" (via linked @ktampone.bsky.social article) means in this context, as my understanding is that it could refer to huge range of stuff?
I'm wondering if there's any more info about their immigration status that could be shared. Just trying to get a sense of what "in the U.S. illegally" (via linked @ktampone.bsky.social article) means in this context, as my understanding is that it could refer to huge range of stuff?
April 7, 2025 at 6:09 PM
Great piece.
I'm wondering if there's any more info about their immigration status that could be shared. Just trying to get a sense of what "in the U.S. illegally" (via linked @ktampone.bsky.social article) means in this context, as my understanding is that it could refer to huge range of stuff?
I'm wondering if there's any more info about their immigration status that could be shared. Just trying to get a sense of what "in the U.S. illegally" (via linked @ktampone.bsky.social article) means in this context, as my understanding is that it could refer to huge range of stuff?
Thank you for being there ♥️
April 7, 2025 at 4:51 PM
Thank you for being there ♥️
And cancelling those projects after a research team has already put months of work (and NIH money) into getting off the ground is pretty much always going to be a HUGE waste.
/3
/3
March 28, 2025 at 3:00 AM
And cancelling those projects after a research team has already put months of work (and NIH money) into getting off the ground is pretty much always going to be a HUGE waste.
/3
/3
... that has already made it through the NIH gauntlet is going to involve jeopardizing projects that it seems obviously ridiculous to jeopardize.
/2
/2
March 28, 2025 at 3:00 AM
... that has already made it through the NIH gauntlet is going to involve jeopardizing projects that it seems obviously ridiculous to jeopardize.
/2
/2
A little perplexed by how some language in the article suggests that this grant was mistakenly "caught up" in an overly "broad" definition of DEI. NIH research grants are fundamentally about public health, not to mention really friggin' hard to get. Targeting pretty much ANY study...
/1
/1
March 28, 2025 at 2:53 AM
A little perplexed by how some language in the article suggests that this grant was mistakenly "caught up" in an overly "broad" definition of DEI. NIH research grants are fundamentally about public health, not to mention really friggin' hard to get. Targeting pretty much ANY study...
/1
/1
...info they can use to:
- make comparisons with other studies
- make judgments about our study's reliability, how it might apply or not apply to another context
- critique our work and offer different interpretations
- use our work as a basis for research with a different focus /2
- make comparisons with other studies
- make judgments about our study's reliability, how it might apply or not apply to another context
- critique our work and offer different interpretations
- use our work as a basis for research with a different focus /2
March 24, 2025 at 6:07 PM
...info they can use to:
- make comparisons with other studies
- make judgments about our study's reliability, how it might apply or not apply to another context
- critique our work and offer different interpretations
- use our work as a basis for research with a different focus /2
- make comparisons with other studies
- make judgments about our study's reliability, how it might apply or not apply to another context
- critique our work and offer different interpretations
- use our work as a basis for research with a different focus /2
A research paper like this should not just be a catalog of the findings we drew from our particular methods and sample. It's more like, one entry in a larger body of work by lots of people w/ competing perspectives. We characterize our sample, in part, to give people w/ a different pov... /1
March 24, 2025 at 6:00 PM
A research paper like this should not just be a catalog of the findings we drew from our particular methods and sample. It's more like, one entry in a larger body of work by lots of people w/ competing perspectives. We characterize our sample, in part, to give people w/ a different pov... /1
That is so heartening to hear, thank you
March 24, 2025 at 5:31 PM
That is so heartening to hear, thank you
Is there any update on this? Other projects that were paused over this were re-started a couple days later (in the wake of legal action/memo rescission). Why is this project being treated differently?
February 13, 2025 at 8:19 PM
Is there any update on this? Other projects that were paused over this were re-started a couple days later (in the wake of legal action/memo rescission). Why is this project being treated differently?
