Siân Culley
superresolusian.bsky.social
Siân Culley
@superresolusian.bsky.social
Still seeking M. Ulder for joint author paper.
Microscopes ✅ cats ✅ combining the two ❌
Lab --> https://www.kcl.ac.uk/research/culley-group
Thanks Uri (for both the complement and being rigorous in your benchmarking)!
August 22, 2025 at 7:17 PM
This is the result of a super fun collaboration with Andrew Gunawan from @locusj.bsky.social and Erik Meijering's groups at UNSW (there aren't many collaborators I'd brave a 9-11 hour time difference for, but these guys are great 🦘) and @micoxscopy.bsky.social a bit closer to home! (5/5)
August 7, 2025 at 1:00 PM
For giggles, we also discovered that you can deliberately force images to be structurally wacky while still getting high scores on quality metrics (please don't try this at home) (4/5)
August 7, 2025 at 1:00 PM
Most alarmingly, it turns out that sometimes these metrics tell you that your image has got better after image processing, even when your downstream biological analysis gets worse as a result ☹️ (3/5)
August 7, 2025 at 1:00 PM
We show that PSNR and SSIM fundamentally suck (technical scientific term there) for fluorescence microscopy in general. They also love processed images - even if those processed images don't look all that great. (2/5)
August 7, 2025 at 1:00 PM
Haha definitely! Also I'm not sure how hot Great Uncle Donald's Russian was 😂 I do enjoy the apparent mismatch of energies though
December 25, 2024 at 8:34 PM
It's simply too complex for my tiny woman brain to comprehend, Dave
December 25, 2024 at 1:45 PM
Okay this worked!!!! I now have a .zarr that I can open in BigDataViewer, which is the biggest achievement in the last two hours/half a packet of biscuits. Thank you! 💕
December 3, 2024 at 5:05 PM
Yes chef! 👩‍🍳
December 3, 2024 at 4:46 PM
👋 all aboard the struggle bus! 🚌 (a) was the first thing we tried, (b) I don't understand what this means (I am an idiot who mainly only understands tiff files), (c) I'm in the middle of composing a image.sc post so I'll see you over there 🫡
Image.sc Forum
Scientific Community Image Forum is a discussion forum for scientific image software sponsored by the Center for Open Bioimage Analysis (COBA).
image.sc
December 3, 2024 at 4:33 PM
I have tried 😀 I have failed 😩
This threw an error for our test image (18215x18215 pixels, 3 channels) - I tried massaging the chunk size with no joy. Happy to share the error if it's helpful, but I'm 99% sure that the problem is that I am an idiot and failing to understand something fundamental
December 3, 2024 at 4:17 PM
This is our first ever attempt to use zarr and the one image we have converted from .nd2 to .zarr as a test seems to have had the effect of opening a portal to actual hell 😂
December 3, 2024 at 3:19 PM
Gently sobbing into microscopes with a weak smile on my face since 2009
December 2, 2024 at 5:41 PM
There's a good chance we'll be able to extend the post beyond the advertised end date 🤠
Please don't hesitate to drop me a line if you want a chat about the position or are thinking of applying!
November 29, 2024 at 11:58 AM