Blue
superjumpkid.bsky.social
Blue
@superjumpkid.bsky.social
🦖👾👨‍💻📙🍔🍜🛸🚲🎭🏳️‍🌈
Governments are not going to listen until we get millionaires who promise to donate money to them if they do this. “Keep taxing me nothing and I’ll give you part of the spoils” will always win over pious statements
June 7, 2025 at 7:40 AM
In Europe we don’t have skart so it would be ‘Mario PAL World’
June 6, 2025 at 6:06 PM
This is especially weird given that *this is a BBC production*. So captured by their transphobic editorial stance that they’re dissing their own properties.
May 31, 2025 at 8:18 PM
Sussex University suddenly realising they got off lightly with that fine
May 28, 2025 at 10:58 AM
Sure Steve. Sure. What about my post made you think I’m a bot? Criticising Starmer, or my sweet sweet femme Godzilla userpic? (Your posts suggest you largely agree with the first. And the userpic really is great)
May 23, 2025 at 8:49 AM
This title change would also ‘professionalise’ an undervalued, underpaid, and still predominantly female profession. So it’s possible he’s also trying to prevent increased pay for those professionals (it’s Wes, it’s probably both the pandering to fascism AND the penny pinching)
May 16, 2025 at 10:16 AM
I came back to reconsider this motion because it’s apparently in part the effort of trans history week folks. But I checked and yes it doesn’t say those basic things above and it’s still only been signed by 19 MPs. Softening the language didn’t get support.
May 16, 2025 at 6:39 AM
Reposted by Blue
how about this
May 15, 2025 at 2:49 PM
It’s extra hilarious that a nothing burger like this is explicitly framed as “oh no we’ve been kicked out of pride, better make a statement to get back in!”
May 15, 2025 at 6:53 AM
Things this early day motion don’t say:
* Trans peoples are the gender they say they are
* The SC ruling misinterprets the EA and the government can fix that by updating the law
* Minorities should always be heard in case that affect them
May 15, 2025 at 6:53 AM