Sue
@suescishaw.bsky.social
Retired Science Technician (Education)
Previously SENCO Early Years
Mum to severely autistic son
& Resident Doctor daughter.
Centre left
Gardening/Travel/Hiking/Outdoors
#DisabilityRights #NHS
#SocialCare #Inclusion #MoreInCommon #BeKind #HopeNotHate
Previously SENCO Early Years
Mum to severely autistic son
& Resident Doctor daughter.
Centre left
Gardening/Travel/Hiking/Outdoors
#DisabilityRights #NHS
#SocialCare #Inclusion #MoreInCommon #BeKind #HopeNotHate
Trouble is, whether journalists like it or not, trust in the media is poor. Similar to public distrust in politicians!
Social media has completely changed public engagement with politics. Now some journalists desperately try to get "exclusives" "breaking news" for the clicks & forget actual facts..
Social media has completely changed public engagement with politics. Now some journalists desperately try to get "exclusives" "breaking news" for the clicks & forget actual facts..
November 14, 2025 at 2:20 PM
Trouble is, whether journalists like it or not, trust in the media is poor. Similar to public distrust in politicians!
Social media has completely changed public engagement with politics. Now some journalists desperately try to get "exclusives" "breaking news" for the clicks & forget actual facts..
Social media has completely changed public engagement with politics. Now some journalists desperately try to get "exclusives" "breaking news" for the clicks & forget actual facts..
Can we all calm down now?
November 14, 2025 at 9:06 AM
Can we all calm down now?
Some odd questioning from political journalists today, asking if Starmer is going to sack the "leakers."
And now apparently no one in No 10 is owning up to it.
Surely journalists know who leaked the info & therefore can name the source.
Or it was over exaggerated from the beginning?
And now apparently no one in No 10 is owning up to it.
Surely journalists know who leaked the info & therefore can name the source.
Or it was over exaggerated from the beginning?
November 13, 2025 at 4:39 PM
Some odd questioning from political journalists today, asking if Starmer is going to sack the "leakers."
And now apparently no one in No 10 is owning up to it.
Surely journalists know who leaked the info & therefore can name the source.
Or it was over exaggerated from the beginning?
And now apparently no one in No 10 is owning up to it.
Surely journalists know who leaked the info & therefore can name the source.
Or it was over exaggerated from the beginning?
The problem is less Starmer’s position being untenable, and more the UK being ungovernable. We have two problems:
1. The immovable position from so many that a government must deliver lower taxes and better services. To many still believe this can be done by minor tinkering. /1
1. The immovable position from so many that a government must deliver lower taxes and better services. To many still believe this can be done by minor tinkering. /1
I find the endless, often pointless drama that has typified UK politics coverage for a decade as draining & unedifying as anyone. But, *as of now* & by every relevant measure, Starmer’s position is perilously close to untenable. Of course people are planning for a future where he’s no longer leader.
November 12, 2025 at 1:24 PM