"the government should try, convict and then kill the secretary of defense for the crime he very obviously seems to have committed" seems like a radical thing to say, but -- no, it's not. it's the actual penalty for what pete hegseth, a man who ordered death squads to murder civilians, has done.

The tie Hegseths wearing has a deeper shade of blue, and the white is closer to a “silver-ish” tone.

Tbf the tie only looks like a Russian flag because of how it happens to be tied.

There’s a red stripe underneath that knot, which is placed probably to keep the tie at a respectable length. White, blue, and red (🇷🇺) becomes red, white, and blue (🇳🇱) if you start counting at a different point.

I think you’re grasping at straws on this one, for the sole reason of Hegseth probably just isn’t smart enough to think of that.

With this I think those AI written poems do not qualify as ‘art,’ since they were not created as a means of any creative or emotional expression.

They are but an imitation, that might in a “structural” sense count as poems, but they are not art.

I think in a broader, more literal and “check-the-boxes” sense you’re right that machines can write poetry that does have a level of sophistication to it.

However, I do agree with the sentiment that human emotion is a crucial component to an artistic piece.