Let's see how much work it takes until this is something I can fully agree with!

(8/8)

I'll repent for my problematic like (and desire) by logging out for a few days.

Sorry for making it about me, but that way it's easier to see how the problem is me.

I can't help it - but I'll figure out why I can't help it.

I soul-searched myself out of gender, I can do it out of this.

(7/8)

Once is a comedic accident, twice is a tragic desire.

To avoid chauvinism, I won't speak on this subject anymore until I figure why I desire to do away with "all existing culture, nationality, and religion".

Maybe it can be traced back to trauma, maybe not. Psychoanalysis isn't always right. (6/8)

When confronted on DMs as to my problematic like, I panicked (and not just because my liked porn was apparently public).

I used kettle logic: I didn't do it, or if I did I didn't know it, of if I did I had my reasons...

The truth is clear: I did it, I knew it, and had no reason at all. (5/8)

Apologies are only needed for doubled mistakes though. If it was an accident, there's no fault in it. If it wasn't, then it wasn't a mistake.

An apology is needed when you make an accident and then, out of free will, you choose to double down, to hide it, to ignore it.

Which is what I did. (4/8)

I liked this skeet - I think it's true. Communism, if it arrives, will be to us like capitalism was to feudalism: for better AND for worse, forever.

I did not realize this skeet wasn't a dunk on a "retvrn" nationalist (which would be based) but on an indigenous person (which is cringe). (3/8)

I'm making this apology about me instead of what I should be apologizing for - the first one is to show how even in empathy I'm selfish, and the second one is this:

"Communism will do away with all existing culture, nationality, and religion, I don't know why thats so controversial to you." (2/8)

yes!

maybe I should reach nietzsche

"one of those fucking zizek people" :(

yes, regardless of quality though, I'm mostly saying it's debateable that he stood for reconciliation because he never used the terms "thesis, antithesis, and synthesis" in his own thought (these are mostly Fitchean terms, after all).

plenty of non-metaphysical interpretations of Hegel nowadays!

It's debateable whether Hegel really was a thinker of reconciliation, but I am in agreement with the hope for something better!

I can't safely prove that asphalt takes like licorice so I'm just gonna take your word for it! eat something healthier next dream!

The Žižek inversion of "first as farce, then as tragedy" is also great.

Once implies it's an accident. Twice means it's working as intended.

why were you eating a chunk of asphalt in your dream??