Strategy Science
strategyscience.bsky.social
Strategy Science
@strategyscience.bsky.social
Science of gray zone / hybrid warfare, intelligence, cyber security, war strategy, extremism, social sciences, & law to combat radicalization

#natsec #infosec #cybersecurity #science 🧪 #NatSecSky
That's, again, your interpretation. You are so defensive that there's really not reasoning with you.

Have you, for example,considered also reading the line that isn't highlighted?

Anger management, bro.
February 18, 2025 at 2:31 AM
It is very clear here that we have folks interpreting it in different ways. You can pretend they don't exist, but that doesn't mean they actually don't.
February 18, 2025 at 2:26 AM
No one is saying the title misled. You're in a strangely defensive posture.

Nothing ruled out the possibility that after the affidavit was submitted, something didn't happen to the woman or baby.

Being less deterministic about ways things may be interpreted is a skill that could benefit you.
February 18, 2025 at 2:25 AM
It's pretty common for judges to want more time to think abut the arguments and effects of their decisions for rulings.
February 18, 2025 at 2:20 AM
Reposted by Strategy Science
This is the problem with influencers pushing the narrative that specialists (govt, science, etc) don't actually know more than anybody else, and just use their titles and elite status to grift. In that warped reality, facts are the provenance of opinion, and deciding for yourself is a virtue. Chaos.
February 18, 2025 at 1:22 AM
I disagree.
February 18, 2025 at 2:10 AM
It did kind of read like fromhis post that this was filed and then the baby or mom may have died after it was filed. Clarification isn't a bad idea and I did read it. I do think you're right about what he meant though.
February 18, 2025 at 2:05 AM
This is a great thread.
February 18, 2025 at 1:10 AM
The authors said “suffer” is “language of illness” and while it may provoke empathy “it does also suggest BAME victimhood rather than steadfastness and agency”.
February 18, 2025 at 12:59 AM
Experiment #3

When far-right individuals choose to share misinformation, virtue signal.

Virtue signaling is strongest when the misinformation presented relates to sacred community values (immigration, religion, nationalism).
February 18, 2025 at 12:14 AM
Experiment #2

Republicans who voted for Trump were undeterred by Twitter fact-checks and were willing to share the misinformation anyway.

Social media fact-checks or flagging of “fake news” may not sufficiently prevent the spread of misinformation, especially if it has an extremist agenda.
February 18, 2025 at 12:08 AM
Experiment #1:

Despite fact-checks and accuracy nudges, far-right individuals were far more likely compared to center-right individuals to reshare blatant misinformation - especially if it resonated with their sacred values & if their personal identity closely related to their political ideology.
February 18, 2025 at 12:03 AM
I've seen a lot of people, even Dems, swear they wouldn't be coming after states when it is obvious they are going to do so. People really seem to not get just how bad this is going to all be.
February 17, 2025 at 11:46 PM
The pilot did such a good job though for landing it safely as they could. Imagine having to land it upside down.
February 17, 2025 at 11:39 PM
I wonder how Trump's has been resolved. Seems like whomever is supposed to enforce them isn't and I don't know who that responsibility actually falls upon.
February 17, 2025 at 11:33 PM
That's also absolutely not true about his security clearance.
February 17, 2025 at 11:27 PM
Ugh. It's paywalled using that link too, unfortunately.
February 17, 2025 at 3:57 AM
Thank you!!
February 17, 2025 at 3:56 AM
Paywalling stuff right now is so unethical. I wish the press would stop paywalling at least anything related to what's happening now.
February 17, 2025 at 3:43 AM
Also funny because Natsios works at Texas A&M's Bush School. They rarely speak up on issues like this but is says something that he is.
February 17, 2025 at 3:28 AM