StormBringer, Harbinger of Chaos
@stevenhildebrand.bsky.social
Chaotic Good
If you are looking for the RPG stuff, that's on the other account:
@vintagerpgs.bsky.social
If you are looking for the RPG stuff, that's on the other account:
@vintagerpgs.bsky.social
November 14, 2025 at 8:58 AM
Obviously a DEI hire.
"Thrift, thrift, Horatio! The funeral bak'd-meats
Did coldly furnish forth the marriage tables."
"Thrift, thrift, Horatio! The funeral bak'd-meats
Did coldly furnish forth the marriage tables."
September 21, 2025 at 7:24 PM
Obviously a DEI hire.
"Thrift, thrift, Horatio! The funeral bak'd-meats
Did coldly furnish forth the marriage tables."
"Thrift, thrift, Horatio! The funeral bak'd-meats
Did coldly furnish forth the marriage tables."
"Fash on fash violence" needs to be the new talking point.
September 15, 2025 at 7:29 PM
"Fash on fash violence" needs to be the new talking point.
We are very short on time, let's stop wasting it trying to implement the fantasy of an electoral plan for victory.
August 31, 2025 at 7:24 PM
We are very short on time, let's stop wasting it trying to implement the fantasy of an electoral plan for victory.
Also the primary reason we have narcissists and sociopaths in charge of everything; people are trained to accept even the faintest appearance of authority as 100% legitimate.
August 10, 2025 at 8:32 PM
Also the primary reason we have narcissists and sociopaths in charge of everything; people are trained to accept even the faintest appearance of authority as 100% legitimate.
Countdown to "homosexual" being a mental illness again.
July 29, 2025 at 5:36 AM
Countdown to "homosexual" being a mental illness again.
Reposted by StormBringer, Harbinger of Chaos
You know something has gone bad when the government spokesperson says, please don’t use my name …
“Asked for comment, a spokeswoman for the Department of Homeland Security who declined to be identified…”
www.nytimes.com/2025/07/11/c...
“Asked for comment, a spokeswoman for the Department of Homeland Security who declined to be identified…”
www.nytimes.com/2025/07/11/c...
FEMA Didn’t Answer Thousands of Calls From Flood Survivors, Documents Show
www.nytimes.com
July 11, 2025 at 11:44 PM
You know something has gone bad when the government spokesperson says, please don’t use my name …
“Asked for comment, a spokeswoman for the Department of Homeland Security who declined to be identified…”
www.nytimes.com/2025/07/11/c...
“Asked for comment, a spokeswoman for the Department of Homeland Security who declined to be identified…”
www.nytimes.com/2025/07/11/c...
Not looking great for the EU.
July 10, 2025 at 2:54 PM
Not looking great for the EU.
It's entirely your fault, dipshit.
We all know those orders from various judges were performative, intended to build up the case for revoking universal injunctions.
We all know those orders from various judges were performative, intended to build up the case for revoking universal injunctions.
July 10, 2025 at 12:05 AM
It's entirely your fault, dipshit.
We all know those orders from various judges were performative, intended to build up the case for revoking universal injunctions.
We all know those orders from various judges were performative, intended to build up the case for revoking universal injunctions.
Let's be clear, this isn't some new direction or a wildly unpredictable shift that only occurred in the last four months. This has been in the works for decades. This was always the end game.
Trump-GOP’s Supreme Court Rubber Stamp Goes Too Far | Elie Mystal | TMR
YouTube video by The Majority Report w/ Sam Seder
www.youtube.com
July 6, 2025 at 4:35 AM
Let's be clear, this isn't some new direction or a wildly unpredictable shift that only occurred in the last four months. This has been in the works for decades. This was always the end game.
"Court offers no reasons
This one didn’t. Indeed, in D.V.D. the court didn’t even bother to give any reasons for its decision — almost certainly because there aren’t any that pass the laugh test."
They aren't even pretending their decisions are based on any kind of jurisprudence.
This one didn’t. Indeed, in D.V.D. the court didn’t even bother to give any reasons for its decision — almost certainly because there aren’t any that pass the laugh test."
They aren't even pretending their decisions are based on any kind of jurisprudence.
Opinion: As July 4 approaches, Supreme Court signs away American democracy
Stanford law professor says pivotal rulings last week removed the last defense against a lawless president.
www.mercurynews.com
July 6, 2025 at 4:33 AM
"Court offers no reasons
This one didn’t. Indeed, in D.V.D. the court didn’t even bother to give any reasons for its decision — almost certainly because there aren’t any that pass the laugh test."
They aren't even pretending their decisions are based on any kind of jurisprudence.
This one didn’t. Indeed, in D.V.D. the court didn’t even bother to give any reasons for its decision — almost certainly because there aren’t any that pass the laugh test."
They aren't even pretending their decisions are based on any kind of jurisprudence.
