Steve-f1-fan
steve-f1-fan.bsky.social
Steve-f1-fan
@steve-f1-fan.bsky.social
From Oz. Interested in energy and environmental politics, US and aussie politics, f1 fan.
Reposted by Steve-f1-fan
“If you're not careful, the newspapers will have you hating the people who are being oppressed, and loving the people who are doing
the oppressing."
December 22, 2025 at 12:39 PM
I suspect Steve Bannon wrote this. Too coherent and not enough self praise to be an authentic Trump tweet.
December 18, 2025 at 1:33 AM
This sounds more like Trump than the original
December 18, 2025 at 1:31 AM
Trump kills the drug boaters saying they are terrorists. In reality, they are mules for drug oligarchs, risking their lives for their daily sustenance. The real drug lords are safe and sound, and if they do get caught, they are pardoned by Trump.
December 12, 2025 at 11:12 PM
He really meant…
We are subsidising our farmers who have been hurt by my tariffs. We will have to maintain this unlevel playing field indefinitely so we need to keep taxing Americans to pay for this.
December 10, 2025 at 12:47 AM
Blaming the vendors is ridiculous. The senior bureaucrats who ran/approved this project should be accountable, as well as those who approved the budget. And yes, no more consultant open cheque books.
December 3, 2025 at 3:43 AM
Because the business case for an unsubsidised stand alone battery is difficult to make, but if you need to buy a car, you get a v2h battery as a bonus.
December 1, 2025 at 1:45 PM
She sounds like Susan Collins.
November 10, 2025 at 2:31 PM
People see masked govt employees violently detaining ordinary folks daily on their social media platforms, so it’s hardly surprising that people believe the govt is fascist. Not sure myself. What govt actions do you think would justify the label?
November 9, 2025 at 12:41 PM
The current Labor govt don’t care about biodiversity or the environment. What they care about is the appearance of it. If they really cared, they would stop promoting the destruction of eco habitat to build a so called renewable energy system when nuclear has a vastly smaller enviro impact.
November 8, 2025 at 5:46 AM
It is a subtle improvement to the preferential voting system (which is a very good voting system).
November 8, 2025 at 5:17 AM
The current system requires you to number every box (in the house of reps). With Optional preferential voting (not yet allowed), you need only number the boxes you want and leave others blank. This would allow you to cast a valid vote without assisting someone you do not want to assist. /2
November 8, 2025 at 5:17 AM
Agree with the view that OPTIONAL preferential voting would more accurately reflect the electorates preferred candidate. Especially in the Senate (doing away with above the line). Until then, ???
#auspol
November 8, 2025 at 3:48 AM
Isn’t it weird that every time a new subsidy is announced, my electricity bill goes up. Hmmm.
November 7, 2025 at 7:59 AM
I wish all the Democrat congress people were as good as Crocket. A star.
November 7, 2025 at 7:10 AM
If Mamdani is NY’s Robin Hood, Cruz is the Sheriff of Nottingham (one of many)
November 6, 2025 at 11:30 PM
Spot on. One only needs to recognise that Albo/Marles/Wong took only 17 hours to fully endorse Morrisons Aukus idea. Our biggest capital investment ever and they did not even analyse it because it was good politics. And they had the temerity to malign Keating for speaking sense.
November 3, 2025 at 6:39 AM
Great. If they are fully profitable, they don’t need government funding. You have solved the problem.
November 3, 2025 at 2:22 AM
Don’t let ‘perfect’ be the enemy of the ‘good’. Spent nuclear fuel is far easier to manage than waste from fossil fuel plants.
November 2, 2025 at 9:25 PM
These 6? Really? No nuclear? Just a reminder that France has the lowest emissions from electricity production in the developed industrialised world apart from countries who are blessed with hydro resources.
November 1, 2025 at 10:05 PM
You spelt his name like Cuomo pronounces it. Wrong.
October 31, 2025 at 8:15 PM
The better question is .. who should be removed. Richard Marles is on top of my list.
October 30, 2025 at 8:59 PM