If you do make a mistake, hopefully you have the flexibility of mind to catch it early.
🔺~🔺
If you like these annotations of investor letters, let us know with a like and we'll do more!
If you do make a mistake, hopefully you have the flexibility of mind to catch it early.
🔺~🔺
If you like these annotations of investor letters, let us know with a like and we'll do more!
Had he kept his full position in Bombardier,
he would have watched a single postion become more than half of his portfolio to only then be decimated to just a ~10% postion (down 80%).
(10/x)
Had he kept his full position in Bombardier,
he would have watched a single postion become more than half of his portfolio to only then be decimated to just a ~10% postion (down 80%).
(10/x)
3) Things can always go up more, but that should not be an investment consideration.
(9/x)
3) Things can always go up more, but that should not be an investment consideration.
(9/x)
1) Bombardier selling may have been a good decision,
but buying it in the first place may have been wrong.
The business proved to perform poorly in a recession.
If it hadn't happened to be over or fully valued at the time, he would have likely held.
(8/x)
1) Bombardier selling may have been a good decision,
but buying it in the first place may have been wrong.
The business proved to perform poorly in a recession.
If it hadn't happened to be over or fully valued at the time, he would have likely held.
(8/x)
Again, this was a long sega where the intelligence of his decison was unclear for years.
He quotes Fisher: "It is easier to know WHAT will happen than WHEN it will happen"
(7/x)
Again, this was a long sega where the intelligence of his decison was unclear for years.
He quotes Fisher: "It is easier to know WHAT will happen than WHEN it will happen"
(7/x)
He owned the stock at 5x earnings.
Then sold at a gain because of competition fears in 1997.
It traded at 100x earnings before crashing below his orginal acquistion price years earlier.
(6/x)
He owned the stock at 5x earnings.
Then sold at a gain because of competition fears in 1997.
It traded at 100x earnings before crashing below his orginal acquistion price years earlier.
(6/x)
He felt smart for making the investment.
Stupid for selling early.
Then vindicated for heavily trimming.
To ultimately be wrong for a different reason-- the quality of the business was low if it couldn't withstand a recession
(5/x)
He felt smart for making the investment.
Stupid for selling early.
Then vindicated for heavily trimming.
To ultimately be wrong for a different reason-- the quality of the business was low if it couldn't withstand a recession
(5/x)
It wasn't just valuation that was hit;
weakness in the business model was exposed as well.
(4/x)
It wasn't just valuation that was hit;
weakness in the business model was exposed as well.
(4/x)
When writing a post-mortem in 1999 (two years after he sold), he thought he made a mistake with one caveat:
until there was a recession, he would not admit he was wrong to sell.
(3/x)
When writing a post-mortem in 1999 (two years after he sold), he thought he made a mistake with one caveat:
until there was a recession, he would not admit he was wrong to sell.
(3/x)
At the time he thought the valuation was high, future prospects were worse, and a key manager left.
(2/x)
At the time he thought the valuation was high, future prospects were worse, and a key manager left.
(2/x)