Heikki Ketola (SomniatorSound)
@somniatorsound.bsky.social
Media composer, sound designer and a hobbyist writer. Director of "A Real Composer". PhD researcher at night.
....except those who are financially benefitting from it.
This gives a general feeling that AI is a financial decision, not an artistic one, as artistically it seems like a suicide.
But what about artistry? Would the claim from secret level that there was a big deal of artistry happening be true?
This gives a general feeling that AI is a financial decision, not an artistic one, as artistically it seems like a suicide.
But what about artistry? Would the claim from secret level that there was a big deal of artistry happening be true?
November 9, 2025 at 10:35 AM
....except those who are financially benefitting from it.
This gives a general feeling that AI is a financial decision, not an artistic one, as artistically it seems like a suicide.
But what about artistry? Would the claim from secret level that there was a big deal of artistry happening be true?
This gives a general feeling that AI is a financial decision, not an artistic one, as artistically it seems like a suicide.
But what about artistry? Would the claim from secret level that there was a big deal of artistry happening be true?
Coca Cola is well aware of the backlash. Their brand is so strong that it doesnt matter, and they can get away with experimentation, unlike many other companies.
The harsh reality is that I have not seen a single person in social media thinking that AI was a good idea...
The harsh reality is that I have not seen a single person in social media thinking that AI was a good idea...
November 9, 2025 at 10:33 AM
Coca Cola is well aware of the backlash. Their brand is so strong that it doesnt matter, and they can get away with experimentation, unlike many other companies.
The harsh reality is that I have not seen a single person in social media thinking that AI was a good idea...
The harsh reality is that I have not seen a single person in social media thinking that AI was a good idea...
The situation is about overing up the AI, pretending like it waa not used, while at the same time trying to be proud of AI. Its like using a tool and then being ashamed that you used it. Which is it?
Secret level is clearly in it for the projects and income, and they pick whichever side is winning.
Secret level is clearly in it for the projects and income, and they pick whichever side is winning.
November 9, 2025 at 10:31 AM
The situation is about overing up the AI, pretending like it waa not used, while at the same time trying to be proud of AI. Its like using a tool and then being ashamed that you used it. Which is it?
Secret level is clearly in it for the projects and income, and they pick whichever side is winning.
Secret level is clearly in it for the projects and income, and they pick whichever side is winning.
The strange part is that Secret Level claims to drive AI innovation on filmmaking, but even they went out of their way to message that the value comes from human labor and the AI is in a side role. Even though this was a blatant lie, they still accidentally showed that even they dont value AI
November 9, 2025 at 10:29 AM
The strange part is that Secret Level claims to drive AI innovation on filmmaking, but even they went out of their way to message that the value comes from human labor and the AI is in a side role. Even though this was a blatant lie, they still accidentally showed that even they dont value AI
The issue with that was that all of the content in the bts-video is also AI-generated or staged. Secret Level tried to convey the message that the AI still requires humans and genuine artistry, while managing to prove the oppposite.
November 9, 2025 at 10:27 AM
The issue with that was that all of the content in the bts-video is also AI-generated or staged. Secret Level tried to convey the message that the AI still requires humans and genuine artistry, while managing to prove the oppposite.
So the real april fools would be that they *dont* come?
April 1, 2025 at 6:15 AM
So the real april fools would be that they *dont* come?
To be fair, its good when it provides links to sources and you ignore the output text.
March 19, 2025 at 5:48 PM
To be fair, its good when it provides links to sources and you ignore the output text.
So the dataset could then be interpreted as the art world and the AI the creator.
So according to him, an AI is capable of being an artist, or possessing artistry.
So according to him, an AI is capable of being an artist, or possessing artistry.
March 12, 2025 at 11:32 AM
So the dataset could then be interpreted as the art world and the AI the creator.
So according to him, an AI is capable of being an artist, or possessing artistry.
So according to him, an AI is capable of being an artist, or possessing artistry.
For Becker, creator is the one who "made" the art piece and the art world is everything that influenced it. Is the AI the creator then?
In short, yes. For Becker, an art creator is someone, who creates art within the constraints of an art world - or in this case, the dataset.
In short, yes. For Becker, an art creator is someone, who creates art within the constraints of an art world - or in this case, the dataset.
March 12, 2025 at 11:31 AM
For Becker, creator is the one who "made" the art piece and the art world is everything that influenced it. Is the AI the creator then?
In short, yes. For Becker, an art creator is someone, who creates art within the constraints of an art world - or in this case, the dataset.
In short, yes. For Becker, an art creator is someone, who creates art within the constraints of an art world - or in this case, the dataset.
infinite splitting of tasks - just within what is possible for it. Imagine humans collaborating on a painting, where every painter on the planet participates.
According to Becker, this is all artistry in the same way - there isnt much difference. Except the aspect of a creator.
According to Becker, this is all artistry in the same way - there isnt much difference. Except the aspect of a creator.
March 12, 2025 at 11:28 AM
infinite splitting of tasks - just within what is possible for it. Imagine humans collaborating on a painting, where every painter on the planet participates.
According to Becker, this is all artistry in the same way - there isnt much difference. Except the aspect of a creator.
According to Becker, this is all artistry in the same way - there isnt much difference. Except the aspect of a creator.
Surely there must be limits somewhere?
It seems to be random. For a commercial AI, we do not know which art pieces the AI uses specifically to create your output, but there is a finite amount of them as an infinite dataset is impossible.
But the AI system gets close to what couldnbe defined as
It seems to be random. For a commercial AI, we do not know which art pieces the AI uses specifically to create your output, but there is a finite amount of them as an infinite dataset is impossible.
But the AI system gets close to what couldnbe defined as
March 12, 2025 at 11:26 AM
Surely there must be limits somewhere?
It seems to be random. For a commercial AI, we do not know which art pieces the AI uses specifically to create your output, but there is a finite amount of them as an infinite dataset is impossible.
But the AI system gets close to what couldnbe defined as
It seems to be random. For a commercial AI, we do not know which art pieces the AI uses specifically to create your output, but there is a finite amount of them as an infinite dataset is impossible.
But the AI system gets close to what couldnbe defined as
I would argue that the dataset is already the influence, meaning "no influence" is also impossible for an AI.
And the opposite? This is where it gets interesting.
An AI will create art, pixel by pixel, by reading the dataset. Is it therefore splitting each possible task infinitely?
And the opposite? This is where it gets interesting.
An AI will create art, pixel by pixel, by reading the dataset. Is it therefore splitting each possible task infinitely?
March 12, 2025 at 11:24 AM
I would argue that the dataset is already the influence, meaning "no influence" is also impossible for an AI.
And the opposite? This is where it gets interesting.
An AI will create art, pixel by pixel, by reading the dataset. Is it therefore splitting each possible task infinitely?
And the opposite? This is where it gets interesting.
An AI will create art, pixel by pixel, by reading the dataset. Is it therefore splitting each possible task infinitely?
If we close this dataset at a point and create a closed system, is the AI then outside the definition of external influence? Like a human brain in a jar without any outside interference.
According to Becker, this would be impossible for a human, but an AI is not human. Does the theory apply here?
According to Becker, this would be impossible for a human, but an AI is not human. Does the theory apply here?
March 12, 2025 at 11:22 AM
If we close this dataset at a point and create a closed system, is the AI then outside the definition of external influence? Like a human brain in a jar without any outside interference.
According to Becker, this would be impossible for a human, but an AI is not human. Does the theory apply here?
According to Becker, this would be impossible for a human, but an AI is not human. Does the theory apply here?
performes by a separate entity. Work cannot be defined by infinitely splitting it into smaller tasks. Therefore, artistry must be somewhere between these two.
But how does AI come into play?
Art generated by an AI is always based on a dataset - for example existing art.
But how does AI come into play?
Art generated by an AI is always based on a dataset - for example existing art.
March 12, 2025 at 11:21 AM
performes by a separate entity. Work cannot be defined by infinitely splitting it into smaller tasks. Therefore, artistry must be somewhere between these two.
But how does AI come into play?
Art generated by an AI is always based on a dataset - for example existing art.
But how does AI come into play?
Art generated by an AI is always based on a dataset - for example existing art.
And that art cannot be created in a vacuum.
The tools you use, the ideas you have, all come from somewhere. And no art piece is truly "singular", but takes an "art world" to create it.
This however translates to the opposite too. No art can be created so that each possible different task is
The tools you use, the ideas you have, all come from somewhere. And no art piece is truly "singular", but takes an "art world" to create it.
This however translates to the opposite too. No art can be created so that each possible different task is
March 12, 2025 at 11:18 AM
And that art cannot be created in a vacuum.
The tools you use, the ideas you have, all come from somewhere. And no art piece is truly "singular", but takes an "art world" to create it.
This however translates to the opposite too. No art can be created so that each possible different task is
The tools you use, the ideas you have, all come from somewhere. And no art piece is truly "singular", but takes an "art world" to create it.
This however translates to the opposite too. No art can be created so that each possible different task is
AI's also lack continuity. When writing page 3, it has already forgotten what was on page 1. A fully generated novel would be a weird jamble with the current tech (still).
January 2, 2025 at 2:08 PM
AI's also lack continuity. When writing page 3, it has already forgotten what was on page 1. A fully generated novel would be a weird jamble with the current tech (still).
Most AI's dont want to allocate enough memory for a consumer to create lenghty things. The longer the text is, the larger computing power it needs, and if a million people would generate novels at the same time, their servers would melt.
January 2, 2025 at 2:06 PM
Most AI's dont want to allocate enough memory for a consumer to create lenghty things. The longer the text is, the larger computing power it needs, and if a million people would generate novels at the same time, their servers would melt.
Length is kind of directly tied to the "risk" of the film. The longer it is, the more confident the studio is of it.
December 26, 2024 at 12:50 PM
Length is kind of directly tied to the "risk" of the film. The longer it is, the more confident the studio is of it.
Public pages still own the copyright of any content posted on them and need to agree to the scraping. OpenAI scraping twitter requires twitter to agree to it.
There is no "free for all" content, especially in Europe.
There is no "free for all" content, especially in Europe.
December 25, 2024 at 9:06 PM
Public pages still own the copyright of any content posted on them and need to agree to the scraping. OpenAI scraping twitter requires twitter to agree to it.
There is no "free for all" content, especially in Europe.
There is no "free for all" content, especially in Europe.
Those are all very real issues that cannot be overlooked. Training data is currently illegal in many countries and there is no excuse for it. As much as humans have to adapt to AI, AI companies have to adapt to buying licenses for their data.
Job loss is inevitable, but most of it temporary.
Job loss is inevitable, but most of it temporary.
December 25, 2024 at 1:25 PM
Those are all very real issues that cannot be overlooked. Training data is currently illegal in many countries and there is no excuse for it. As much as humans have to adapt to AI, AI companies have to adapt to buying licenses for their data.
Job loss is inevitable, but most of it temporary.
Job loss is inevitable, but most of it temporary.