Here is a link to a talk through of my presentation (spoken English with English captions youtu.be/-eGHSRsuw6Q and here are my slides, osf.io/truqk/files/... #TISLR15 #linguistics

It should be ‘theme’, not team, but maybe go either way.

Also here’s the OSF link, too.
osf.io/7rt6g

So, who signers were getting nonmanual cues in which condition was crucial in their performance.

More interestingly, signers were fast when they had parts of hands visible in the videos and mouthing, but they were less accurate. They were faster and more accurate with head nod when they had fewer amount of cues. They were slower and more accurate with head nod with medium amount of cues.

In the perception study in TID, the signers did not perform better with the highest amount of cues. They benefited from different amount of cues in different conditions.

Our main finding in production study is that both ASL and TID signers increased their nonmanuals to signal atypicality to their interlocutors. There was individual differences in the overall amount of cues but all participants increased the number of cues.