An Extended Community isn't some land with boundaries, it is a CONCEPT that refers to the groups that originate from this community. A group cannot 'opt out' of their origin.
There is nothing wrong with being an EC group; rejecting your origins begs for outside criticism.
There is nothing wrong with being an EC group; rejecting your origins begs for outside criticism.
February 11, 2026 at 9:26 PM
An Extended Community isn't some land with boundaries, it is a CONCEPT that refers to the groups that originate from this community. A group cannot 'opt out' of their origin.
There is nothing wrong with being an EC group; rejecting your origins begs for outside criticism.
There is nothing wrong with being an EC group; rejecting your origins begs for outside criticism.
Modern-day revolutions don't work because they're not formatted as actual revolutions with the goal of overthrowing their government.
In today's times, revolutions are groups of people getting kicked out, and the group wanting to not participate in our community properly.
In today's times, revolutions are groups of people getting kicked out, and the group wanting to not participate in our community properly.
February 11, 2026 at 9:18 PM
Modern-day revolutions don't work because they're not formatted as actual revolutions with the goal of overthrowing their government.
In today's times, revolutions are groups of people getting kicked out, and the group wanting to not participate in our community properly.
In today's times, revolutions are groups of people getting kicked out, and the group wanting to not participate in our community properly.
It's so difficult to tell if people mean Valhalla the person or the group these days
February 6, 2026 at 1:40 AM
It's so difficult to tell if people mean Valhalla the person or the group these days
The post made a claim, and he responded in kind to that claim, as such the nature of this platform: to make a statement is to expect disagreements, and in turn, other replies that further the conversation
Also, he's stated his intention of the original post wasn't to attack but to debate
Also, he's stated his intention of the original post wasn't to attack but to debate
February 6, 2026 at 1:14 AM
The post made a claim, and he responded in kind to that claim, as such the nature of this platform: to make a statement is to expect disagreements, and in turn, other replies that further the conversation
Also, he's stated his intention of the original post wasn't to attack but to debate
Also, he's stated his intention of the original post wasn't to attack but to debate
How is it dickriding
I'm just generally confused on why the conversation wouldn't be allowed to evolve past first in command to the next closest thing if a settlement on the original post was already made
I'm just generally confused on why the conversation wouldn't be allowed to evolve past first in command to the next closest thing if a settlement on the original post was already made
February 6, 2026 at 1:10 AM
How is it dickriding
I'm just generally confused on why the conversation wouldn't be allowed to evolve past first in command to the next closest thing if a settlement on the original post was already made
I'm just generally confused on why the conversation wouldn't be allowed to evolve past first in command to the next closest thing if a settlement on the original post was already made
It's a conversation, it can move to any topic in any way.
There's nothing saying anything's wrong with it moving to second-in-command
There's nothing saying anything's wrong with it moving to second-in-command
February 6, 2026 at 1:06 AM
It's a conversation, it can move to any topic in any way.
There's nothing saying anything's wrong with it moving to second-in-command
There's nothing saying anything's wrong with it moving to second-in-command
Generally because people aren't debating the actual topic but rather the nature of the post
February 6, 2026 at 1:02 AM
Generally because people aren't debating the actual topic but rather the nature of the post
The original conversation was regarding 1st in command, is it not a logical step to continue the conversation by moving down a rank?
February 6, 2026 at 1:02 AM
The original conversation was regarding 1st in command, is it not a logical step to continue the conversation by moving down a rank?
Simply asking for a reasoning for why people rank you as the best 2ic isn't really conflict-stirring but moreso the basis for legitimate debate
Even if it is meant as a 'jab', it could be refuted with legitimate evidence (as Sorelm did)
Even if it is meant as a 'jab', it could be refuted with legitimate evidence (as Sorelm did)
February 6, 2026 at 12:58 AM
Simply asking for a reasoning for why people rank you as the best 2ic isn't really conflict-stirring but moreso the basis for legitimate debate
Even if it is meant as a 'jab', it could be refuted with legitimate evidence (as Sorelm did)
Even if it is meant as a 'jab', it could be refuted with legitimate evidence (as Sorelm did)
Angel's post was in reply to the people claiming you're the best 2ic, not replying to your post in particular
February 6, 2026 at 12:46 AM
Angel's post was in reply to the people claiming you're the best 2ic, not replying to your post in particular
You have to learn not to reply sometimes
February 6, 2026 at 12:32 AM
You have to learn not to reply sometimes
I don't think the post was created for the purpose of conflict but to genuinely assess whether a claim that Valentine is the best 2ic would be accurate without bias
February 6, 2026 at 12:21 AM
I don't think the post was created for the purpose of conflict but to genuinely assess whether a claim that Valentine is the best 2ic would be accurate without bias
I'm in a special position to say that non-interventionism doesn't contribute towards the community at all, and that you can provide members security & proper community without the need for excessive neutrality
February 6, 2026 at 12:04 AM
I'm in a special position to say that non-interventionism doesn't contribute towards the community at all, and that you can provide members security & proper community without the need for excessive neutrality
The entire Tizanes bloodline is fucked
February 5, 2026 at 11:17 PM
The entire Tizanes bloodline is fucked