Pinned
Oplitic
@siroplitic.bsky.social
ยท 19h
Crossing of the Rabbiteer River
Based off Washington's Crossing of the Delaware
Based off Washington's Crossing of the Delaware
An Extended Community isn't some land with boundaries, it is a CONCEPT that refers to the groups that originate from this community. A group cannot 'opt out' of their origin.
There is nothing wrong with being an EC group; rejecting your origins begs for outside criticism.
There is nothing wrong with being an EC group; rejecting your origins begs for outside criticism.
February 11, 2026 at 9:26 PM
An Extended Community isn't some land with boundaries, it is a CONCEPT that refers to the groups that originate from this community. A group cannot 'opt out' of their origin.
There is nothing wrong with being an EC group; rejecting your origins begs for outside criticism.
There is nothing wrong with being an EC group; rejecting your origins begs for outside criticism.
Modern-day revolutions don't work because they're not formatted as actual revolutions with the goal of overthrowing their government.
In today's times, revolutions are groups of people getting kicked out, and the group wanting to not participate in our community properly.
In today's times, revolutions are groups of people getting kicked out, and the group wanting to not participate in our community properly.
February 11, 2026 at 9:18 PM
Modern-day revolutions don't work because they're not formatted as actual revolutions with the goal of overthrowing their government.
In today's times, revolutions are groups of people getting kicked out, and the group wanting to not participate in our community properly.
In today's times, revolutions are groups of people getting kicked out, and the group wanting to not participate in our community properly.
I don't think it's an issue of size, all EC revolutions start with small membership. It is generally just the attitude of the revolutionaries, and the support they get from outside groups.
Revolutions can be done against massive groups; however, most lack the reasoning, or skills.
Revolutions can be done against massive groups; however, most lack the reasoning, or skills.
Most revolution/anti-certain group EC groups against one of the three main group powers have literally never worked. What do you expect when you have like 15-20 members against a 200+ member group?? It's genuinely so dumb; at least learn not to copy the exact group you are revolting against.
February 11, 2026 at 9:16 PM
I don't think it's an issue of size, all EC revolutions start with small membership. It is generally just the attitude of the revolutionaries, and the support they get from outside groups.
Revolutions can be done against massive groups; however, most lack the reasoning, or skills.
Revolutions can be done against massive groups; however, most lack the reasoning, or skills.
Long Live The President
February 11, 2026 at 5:48 AM
Long Live The President
Reposted by Oplitic
just a lil practice
February 11, 2026 at 5:47 AM
just a lil practice
Reposted by Oplitic
Crossing of the Rabbiteer River
Based off Washington's Crossing of the Delaware
Based off Washington's Crossing of the Delaware
February 11, 2026 at 5:19 AM
Crossing of the Rabbiteer River
Based off Washington's Crossing of the Delaware
Based off Washington's Crossing of the Delaware
Crossing of the Rabbiteer River
Based off Washington's Crossing of the Delaware
Based off Washington's Crossing of the Delaware
February 11, 2026 at 5:19 AM
Crossing of the Rabbiteer River
Based off Washington's Crossing of the Delaware
Based off Washington's Crossing of the Delaware
Nothing happened between February 2025 and February 2026.
February 9, 2026 at 3:43 AM
Nothing happened between February 2025 and February 2026.
It's so difficult to tell if people mean Valhalla the person or the group these days
February 6, 2026 at 1:40 AM
It's so difficult to tell if people mean Valhalla the person or the group these days
The post made a claim, and he responded in kind to that claim, as such the nature of this platform: to make a statement is to expect disagreements, and in turn, other replies that further the conversation
Also, he's stated his intention of the original post wasn't to attack but to debate
Also, he's stated his intention of the original post wasn't to attack but to debate
February 6, 2026 at 1:14 AM
The post made a claim, and he responded in kind to that claim, as such the nature of this platform: to make a statement is to expect disagreements, and in turn, other replies that further the conversation
Also, he's stated his intention of the original post wasn't to attack but to debate
Also, he's stated his intention of the original post wasn't to attack but to debate
How is it dickriding
I'm just generally confused on why the conversation wouldn't be allowed to evolve past first in command to the next closest thing if a settlement on the original post was already made
I'm just generally confused on why the conversation wouldn't be allowed to evolve past first in command to the next closest thing if a settlement on the original post was already made
February 6, 2026 at 1:10 AM
How is it dickriding
I'm just generally confused on why the conversation wouldn't be allowed to evolve past first in command to the next closest thing if a settlement on the original post was already made
I'm just generally confused on why the conversation wouldn't be allowed to evolve past first in command to the next closest thing if a settlement on the original post was already made
It's a conversation, it can move to any topic in any way.
There's nothing saying anything's wrong with it moving to second-in-command
There's nothing saying anything's wrong with it moving to second-in-command
February 6, 2026 at 1:06 AM
It's a conversation, it can move to any topic in any way.
There's nothing saying anything's wrong with it moving to second-in-command
There's nothing saying anything's wrong with it moving to second-in-command
Generally because people aren't debating the actual topic but rather the nature of the post
February 6, 2026 at 1:02 AM
Generally because people aren't debating the actual topic but rather the nature of the post
The original conversation was regarding 1st in command, is it not a logical step to continue the conversation by moving down a rank?
February 6, 2026 at 1:02 AM
The original conversation was regarding 1st in command, is it not a logical step to continue the conversation by moving down a rank?
Simply asking for a reasoning for why people rank you as the best 2ic isn't really conflict-stirring but moreso the basis for legitimate debate
Even if it is meant as a 'jab', it could be refuted with legitimate evidence (as Sorelm did)
Even if it is meant as a 'jab', it could be refuted with legitimate evidence (as Sorelm did)
February 6, 2026 at 12:58 AM
Simply asking for a reasoning for why people rank you as the best 2ic isn't really conflict-stirring but moreso the basis for legitimate debate
Even if it is meant as a 'jab', it could be refuted with legitimate evidence (as Sorelm did)
Even if it is meant as a 'jab', it could be refuted with legitimate evidence (as Sorelm did)
Angel's post was in reply to the people claiming you're the best 2ic, not replying to your post in particular
February 6, 2026 at 12:46 AM
Angel's post was in reply to the people claiming you're the best 2ic, not replying to your post in particular
You have to learn not to reply sometimes
February 6, 2026 at 12:32 AM
You have to learn not to reply sometimes
I don't think the post was created for the purpose of conflict but to genuinely assess whether a claim that Valentine is the best 2ic would be accurate without bias
February 6, 2026 at 12:21 AM
I don't think the post was created for the purpose of conflict but to genuinely assess whether a claim that Valentine is the best 2ic would be accurate without bias
I'm in a special position to say that non-interventionism doesn't contribute towards the community at all, and that you can provide members security & proper community without the need for excessive neutrality
February 6, 2026 at 12:04 AM
I'm in a special position to say that non-interventionism doesn't contribute towards the community at all, and that you can provide members security & proper community without the need for excessive neutrality
Non-conventional war has ruined this community beyond recognition
We as a collective need to return to a war-based community instead of our groups just being Discord communities straight from 2020
We as a collective need to return to a war-based community instead of our groups just being Discord communities straight from 2020
Reporting warfare is so dumb brah just war the actual group at that point
February 5, 2026 at 11:26 PM
Non-conventional war has ruined this community beyond recognition
We as a collective need to return to a war-based community instead of our groups just being Discord communities straight from 2020
We as a collective need to return to a war-based community instead of our groups just being Discord communities straight from 2020
The entire Tizanes bloodline is fucked
February 5, 2026 at 11:17 PM
The entire Tizanes bloodline is fucked