Simon McGrath
Simon McGrath
@simonmcg.bsky.social
I occasionally try to explain and comment on ME researchh, or even contribute to it. And I advocate for more and better research.
It's been used for a long time to treat MS. There is anecdotal support, and it is available at some MS therapy centres, but studies haven't found good evidence for it.
mstrust.org.uk/a-z/hyperbar...?
Hyperbaric oxygen therapy
Hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBO or HBOT, also called high dose oxygen therapy (HDOT)) involves breathing oxygen through a mask in a pressurised chamber, similar to a diving bell.
mstrust.org.uk
November 2, 2025 at 9:48 AM
Thanks
October 30, 2025 at 6:35 PM
Got you.

I thought that if psychologists started recognising their limits as helping people cope with a chronic illness, that would be a good thing.
October 30, 2025 at 4:33 PM
Sorry, where does it say that? I didn't read the full piece.
October 30, 2025 at 3:26 PM
Did they say why they took this fundamentally flawed approach?
October 30, 2025 at 11:07 AM
Hi Anna. Thanks for sharing – I've just donated. Enjoy the big birthday, it's what they are for
October 29, 2025 at 9:09 PM
Long ago, when Francis Collins was head of the NIH and briefly taking an interest in this illness, he said he thought that when ME/CFS was finally solved, it would be through discovering a previously unknown biological mechanism (didn't say fatigue specifically).
October 29, 2025 at 10:41 AM
This paper claims neuroticism and other personality disorders in CFS and its methodology is exceptionally flawed. There is a thread on PR from way back, if you're interested. Probably not worth the effort. pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC...
pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
October 29, 2025 at 10:38 AM
They seem to use a lot of parameters in the logistic regression model, as well as not correcting for multiple comparisons in the standard comparison. I wonder if the small number of cases they have (particularly for males) is sufficient to support looking at that number of parameters.
October 24, 2025 at 12:08 PM
In his presentation, Robert Phair said they didn't find a difference in gene expression for ACOD1, so modified the hypothesis to use post-translational modification (prm) to explain the bio differences. But many genes/proteins are involved in ptm, and we might expect a GWAS signal for that.
October 21, 2025 at 7:37 PM
Reposted by Simon McGrath
5) The most interesting presentations were those that collected a lot of novel data without a particular hypothesis, such as the whole-body PET scans by Dr. Michell James.

IMHO, we need more data and measurements, less theory and speculation.
October 21, 2025 at 3:58 PM
Thanks.
October 21, 2025 at 1:20 PM
This comment failed validation on your blog, even though I used my WP user id. Q: The Eric Fauman X post you link to says 70% of causal genes in GWAS are the one closest to the lead SNP, but its reference are in the replies, which can't be seen by non-X users. Can you supply? Thanks.
October 21, 2025 at 10:30 AM