@simone1664.bsky.social
And the Supreme Court is happy with this, they were sold on this by Ben Cooper KC.
Parliament needs to pass fresh legislation.
That TWs will be deterred from legal action because it outs them could persuade MPs of the need for new law.
I hope that is clearer. What do you think?
Parliament needs to pass fresh legislation.
That TWs will be deterred from legal action because it outs them could persuade MPs of the need for new law.
I hope that is clearer. What do you think?
June 14, 2025 at 8:57 AM
And the Supreme Court is happy with this, they were sold on this by Ben Cooper KC.
Parliament needs to pass fresh legislation.
That TWs will be deterred from legal action because it outs them could persuade MPs of the need for new law.
I hope that is clearer. What do you think?
Parliament needs to pass fresh legislation.
That TWs will be deterred from legal action because it outs them could persuade MPs of the need for new law.
I hope that is clearer. What do you think?
Equally, if a TW uses legal route B where a woman would be expected to use legal route A then that raises question as to why TW didn't use legal route A. Onlookers could conclude that TW must be a trans woman.
Like with toilets the TW has to out herself.
Like with toilets the TW has to out herself.
June 14, 2025 at 8:57 AM
Equally, if a TW uses legal route B where a woman would be expected to use legal route A then that raises question as to why TW didn't use legal route A. Onlookers could conclude that TW must be a trans woman.
Like with toilets the TW has to out herself.
Like with toilets the TW has to out herself.
Ok, let's start afresh...
It is bad for trans women to be forced to use the men's loo because they out themselves, onlookers will question why a woman went into the men's and will conclude that they must be a trans woman.
Thus, a TW outs herself and that's bad.
(I hope this is common ground)...
It is bad for trans women to be forced to use the men's loo because they out themselves, onlookers will question why a woman went into the men's and will conclude that they must be a trans woman.
Thus, a TW outs herself and that's bad.
(I hope this is common ground)...
June 14, 2025 at 8:57 AM
Ok, let's start afresh...
It is bad for trans women to be forced to use the men's loo because they out themselves, onlookers will question why a woman went into the men's and will conclude that they must be a trans woman.
Thus, a TW outs herself and that's bad.
(I hope this is common ground)...
It is bad for trans women to be forced to use the men's loo because they out themselves, onlookers will question why a woman went into the men's and will conclude that they must be a trans woman.
Thus, a TW outs herself and that's bad.
(I hope this is common ground)...
Reposted
it's worth putting in context that vanishingly few medical interventions have satisfaction rates that high. www.americanjournalofsurgery.com/article/S000...
A systematic review of patient regret after surgery- A common phenomenon in many specialties but rare within gender-affirmation surgery
Regret after gender-affirming surgery (GAS) is a complex issue. Comparing regret after
GAS to regret after plastic surgery operations and other major life decisions is a
novel approach that can provid...
www.americanjournalofsurgery.com
June 11, 2025 at 11:16 PM
it's worth putting in context that vanishingly few medical interventions have satisfaction rates that high. www.americanjournalofsurgery.com/article/S000...
I am astonished by this pushback. Truly astonished. You expect everyone to go off and qualify as lawyers? A response needs to be quickly mounted to the Supreme Court torpedoing the Equality Act's trans rights.
You do see the urgency here, right? Please tell me you see the urgency.
You do see the urgency here, right? Please tell me you see the urgency.
June 13, 2025 at 11:45 AM
I am astonished by this pushback. Truly astonished. You expect everyone to go off and qualify as lawyers? A response needs to be quickly mounted to the Supreme Court torpedoing the Equality Act's trans rights.
You do see the urgency here, right? Please tell me you see the urgency.
You do see the urgency here, right? Please tell me you see the urgency.
You haven't my question, how is the given output wrong?
I know there are LLM sceptics out there. I use it for code and once pasted in does it compile and do what I want, most often yes.
Obviously legal advice needs some human eyes to verify.
So the question stands, is the advice wrong?
I know there are LLM sceptics out there. I use it for code and once pasted in does it compile and do what I want, most often yes.
Obviously legal advice needs some human eyes to verify.
So the question stands, is the advice wrong?
June 13, 2025 at 11:27 AM
You haven't my question, how is the given output wrong?
I know there are LLM sceptics out there. I use it for code and once pasted in does it compile and do what I want, most often yes.
Obviously legal advice needs some human eyes to verify.
So the question stands, is the advice wrong?
I know there are LLM sceptics out there. I use it for code and once pasted in does it compile and do what I want, most often yes.
Obviously legal advice needs some human eyes to verify.
So the question stands, is the advice wrong?
Is it wrong? If so, explain why and how it is wrong.
June 13, 2025 at 8:28 AM
Is it wrong? If so, explain why and how it is wrong.
@katymontgomerie.com
Hi Katy, another line of attack ...
UK Supreme Court's salve to trans folk saying you still have protections holds no water once you realise that trans have to out themselves to sue for "sexual discrimination by association"
Hi Katy, another line of attack ...
UK Supreme Court's salve to trans folk saying you still have protections holds no water once you realise that trans have to out themselves to sue for "sexual discrimination by association"
June 12, 2025 at 9:28 PM
Reposted
Well, Guardian. Are you enjoying your victory? Without your perpetual transphobia corrupting the minds of the centrists, the destruction of our human rights would still be seen as a far-right project.
June 6, 2025 at 7:52 AM
Well, Guardian. Are you enjoying your victory? Without your perpetual transphobia corrupting the minds of the centrists, the destruction of our human rights would still be seen as a far-right project.
Reposted
bsky.app/profile/phil...
@theguardian.com please share these facts. We are being horrendously gaslighted by our own EHRC.
@theguardian.com please share these facts. We are being horrendously gaslighted by our own EHRC.
Trans people were lied to??
Using services based on “self ID” (the gender role in which they present) regardless of GRC is right there in the EHRC’s 2011 Code of Practice.
It’s in the EHRC’s own 2022 guidance.
The Labour Gov recognised this too a matter of months ago.
This is horrific gaslighting.
Using services based on “self ID” (the gender role in which they present) regardless of GRC is right there in the EHRC’s 2011 Code of Practice.
It’s in the EHRC’s own 2022 guidance.
The Labour Gov recognised this too a matter of months ago.
This is horrific gaslighting.
June 6, 2025 at 9:44 AM
bsky.app/profile/phil...
@theguardian.com please share these facts. We are being horrendously gaslighted by our own EHRC.
@theguardian.com please share these facts. We are being horrendously gaslighted by our own EHRC.
If we call puberty-related breast development in cis girls an outcome of functional genomics, we must call the same outcome in trans women functional genomics too — otherwise we’re just baking discrimination into scientific language.
June 2, 2025 at 4:21 PM
If we call puberty-related breast development in cis girls an outcome of functional genomics, we must call the same outcome in trans women functional genomics too — otherwise we’re just baking discrimination into scientific language.
I mean please take and re-use and add your own blurb/text etc.
April 30, 2025 at 6:33 PM
I mean please take and re-use and add your own blurb/text etc.