Justin Siewierski
@siewierski.bsky.social
And he knows this, which is all the more reason to say ‘the senate will handle it.’
I assume this conversation never happened. It’s easy for Mike to find a name and start using it. It’s clear his boss responds to situations by watching the news, so why not get ahead and start blaming the next guy?
I assume this conversation never happened. It’s easy for Mike to find a name and start using it. It’s clear his boss responds to situations by watching the news, so why not get ahead and start blaming the next guy?
November 18, 2025 at 5:42 PM
And he knows this, which is all the more reason to say ‘the senate will handle it.’
I assume this conversation never happened. It’s easy for Mike to find a name and start using it. It’s clear his boss responds to situations by watching the news, so why not get ahead and start blaming the next guy?
I assume this conversation never happened. It’s easy for Mike to find a name and start using it. It’s clear his boss responds to situations by watching the news, so why not get ahead and start blaming the next guy?
Reposted by Justin Siewierski
The entirety of the Trump content mill is 90s drama-style cliffhangers. If things are open and shut, there's no reason to listen to tomorrow's podcast. The door must be left open to a larger cabal who ultimately will never be found, because the cabal isn't real and their failures are their own.
October 8, 2025 at 4:41 PM
The entirety of the Trump content mill is 90s drama-style cliffhangers. If things are open and shut, there's no reason to listen to tomorrow's podcast. The door must be left open to a larger cabal who ultimately will never be found, because the cabal isn't real and their failures are their own.