LightNews LightNews
banner
siderau-bs.bsky.social
@siderau-bs.bsky.social
110 followers 150 following 160 posts
Posts Replies Media Videos
siderau-bs.bsky.social
2025 might turn out ok after all
spam email delivered direct to my inbox "Do you want to join the Great Illuminati society to become rich, famous and protected in life, join us today to become a member and solve all your difficult problems in life. Please contact the administration by clicking on "reply to" for more information on how to join this powerful society."
January 23, 2025 at 10:48 PM
siderau-bs.bsky.social
I downloaded the Social Media Minimum Age submissions and asked Copilot to summarise the arguments:
The key themes in support of the Online Safety Amendment (Social Media Minimum Age) Bill 2024 proposal, as reflected in the submissions, include: 1. **Enhanced Online Safety**: Many submissions emphasize the importance of protecting young people from online harm. For instance, the **Youth Law Australia** submission highlights the need to ensure the safety of young people online. 2. **Accountability of Social Media Companies**: There is a strong call for holding social media companies accountable for any harm caused to children and young people. The **batyr** submission supports this stance, emphasizing the importance of involving young people in policy decisions that affect them. 3. **Implementation of Age Verification Technology**: Some submissions, like the one from **Outroll Pty Ltd**, provide a technical perspective on the implementation of age verification technology to enforce the minimum age requirement. 4. **Improved Customer Engagement**: The **61 Social Media Research Institute** submission recommends setting a higher minimum age for social media use and developing tailored Unified Social Media Personas for younger users to enhance their online experience. These themes reflect a collective effort to create a safer and more accountable online environment for young people. If you need more details on any specific submission or theme, feel free to ask! The key themes opposed to the Online Safety Amendment (Social Media Minimum Age) Bill 2024 proposal, as reflected in the submissions, include: 1. **Negative Impact on Youth**: Several submissions argue that the bill could negatively affect young people, particularly those from marginalized communities. For example, the **70 Queer Liberation Boorloo** submission emphasizes the importance of social media for LGBTQIA+ young people for acceptance, safety, and community connection. 2. **Flawed Justification and Implementation**: Some submissions highlight that the bill's justification and implementation are flawed. The **56 Meeum** submission argues that effective age verification technology does not yet exist and that the bill's implementation is not feasible. 3. **Adverse Effects on Community Organizations**: The **54 Lidcombe Community Soccer Club** submission discusses the potential adverse effects on volunteer-run community organizations with junior members. It highlights concerns about the bill's impact on the club's ability to operate and promote itself. 4. **Opposition to Age Restrictions**: There is strong opposition to the age restrictions proposed by the bill. The **58 Aligned Council of Australia** submission expresses strong opposition to the bill and emphasizes the importance of rejecting the ban on social media for under 16s. These themes reflect concerns about the potential negative consequences of the bill on young people and community organizations, as well as doubts about the feasibility of its implementation. If you need more details on any specific submission or theme, feel free to ask!
November 25, 2024 at 2:31 AM