Sarah Piel
@shp212.bsky.social
Lover of child development, golden retrievers, historical mystery series, family and friends who are family. Oh, yeah, and freedom of choice.
Reposted by Sarah Piel
Many precedents—including Bush v. Gore—say that applying different standards to voters in different parts of the state, at the risk of disenfranchisement, violates equal protection. That is EXACTLY what the North Carolina Supreme Court's Republican majority just did. This order is unconstitutional.
April 11, 2025 at 9:55 PM
Many precedents—including Bush v. Gore—say that applying different standards to voters in different parts of the state, at the risk of disenfranchisement, violates equal protection. That is EXACTLY what the North Carolina Supreme Court's Republican majority just did. This order is unconstitutional.
Reposted by Sarah Piel
Reposted by Sarah Piel
Full text, as sent by the White House Office of Communications, of the EO, "PRESERVING AND PROTECTING THE INTEGRITY OF AMERICAN ELECTIONS," since it is still not up: www.documentcloud.org/documents/25...
www.documentcloud.org
March 25, 2025 at 8:14 PM
Full text, as sent by the White House Office of Communications, of the EO, "PRESERVING AND PROTECTING THE INTEGRITY OF AMERICAN ELECTIONS," since it is still not up: www.documentcloud.org/documents/25...