Shoa Clarke
banner
shoaclarke.bsky.social
Shoa Clarke
@shoaclarke.bsky.social

Assistant Professor, Stanford University // Preventive cardiologist for adults & children // https://clarkelab.stanford.edu 🧬🫀💻
Science. We had a good run...
July 3, 2025 at 6:47 PM
Thanks, Jay.
May 21, 2025 at 7:54 PM
Come on now, let's see the QQ Plot 😉
May 20, 2025 at 8:18 PM
This is actually pretty clever 😂😭
April 30, 2025 at 9:02 PM
The frustrating thing is that there is actually an interesting question to be explored here. But instead of doing rigorous work, a private citizen is funding clickbait articles to feed the grifter machine...
April 9, 2025 at 9:03 PM
This is akin to saying that, restricting to people who smoke >3 packs-per-day, smoking is not associated with 1-year risk of lung cancer. To see the association, you need to properly sample the exposure.

[Also, as an aside, you do see the expected trend w/ baseline ApoB & change in plaque volume.]
April 9, 2025 at 8:08 PM
1. The authors' big finding was that change in ApoB did not predict change in plaque. The problem: ApoB DIDN'T change (as the authors explicitly note). Importantly, essentially EVERYONE'S plaque volume DID increase. Hence, this association tells us very little.
April 9, 2025 at 8:02 PM
Thrilled that our work on coronary dominance made the cover of @cellpress.bsky.social! This beautiful image is thanks to the incredible work of @pamrc.bsky.social! 😍

#CardioSky

www.cell.com/cell/fulltex...
April 3, 2025 at 4:53 PM
March 28, 2025 at 7:30 PM
What the actual f---!?

Florida debates lifting some child labor laws to fill jobs vacated by undocumented immigrants

www.cnn.com/2025/03/25/b...
March 26, 2025 at 1:46 PM
Interesting. It looks like @ajpcardio.bsky.social articles now come with AI-generated Q/A bullet points. Here's an example from our recent study on poor implementation of cholesterol guidelines in young adults.

Overall, I'd give it a B. Is this useful?

www.sciencedirect.com/science/arti...
March 25, 2025 at 3:46 PM
We are in the midst of a pandemic of emboldened mids who think themselves clever...
www.wired.com/story/plaint...
March 7, 2025 at 9:01 PM
In mice, we show that patterns of right vs left septal artery dominance are altered by decreasing Cxcl12 expression through heterozygous knockout.
March 5, 2025 at 7:45 PM
We show that dominance is established during fetal development when CXCL12 is being expressed.
March 5, 2025 at 7:43 PM
We used angiograms from the Million Veteran Program to conduct GWAS of coronary dominance, identifying multiple loci. Strikingly, CXCL12 has been implicated in atherosclerotic coronary artery disease (CAD). Hence, our findings suggest overlap in the biology of coronary development and CAD 🤔
March 5, 2025 at 7:37 PM
Most hearts have right dominant coronary anatomy but some have left. Why? Is it random? When/how is dominance established?

Now out in @cellpress.bsky.social, the 1st GWAS of coronary dominance + experiments implicating CXCL12 as a driver of human coronary patterning!

www.cell.com/cell/fulltex...
March 5, 2025 at 7:01 PM
Should race be used to guide when we screen for coronary artery calcium?

No. Here's why. #CardioSky #MedSky

www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/...
March 3, 2025 at 8:59 PM
Our recent work on Lpa, LDL, and coronary plaque severity made it into the "Most read" list! (Barely 😅)

Check it out! #lipids #CVPrev
academic.oup.com/eurjpc/artic...
February 14, 2025 at 12:04 AM
The BMJ will always be the funniest journal 😂
#CardioSky #MedSky
February 4, 2025 at 4:51 PM
At the core of so many of our country's problems is that no one trusts anyone anymore

news.gallup.com/poll/655106/...
January 14, 2025 at 2:41 PM
Not looking forward to the coming onslaught of request to review shoddy Mendelian Randomization papers in 2025...
January 6, 2025 at 4:14 PM
Dang. How much do Danish dogs cost?
www.bbc.com/news/article...
December 24, 2024 at 6:29 PM
This RCT of an intra-atrial shunt device in HF is remarkable for 2 reasons.

1: What a placebo effect! Those who got sham procedure reported significant improvements in symptoms out to 24 months!

2: the device had complete opposite effects on HFpEF vs HFrEF!

www.ahajournals.org/doi/full/10....
December 18, 2024 at 4:29 PM
So why are 1.7 million younger adults with class 1 indications for statin left untreated?

Here is what they report
December 17, 2024 at 6:09 PM
I have been frustrated with guidelines that focus so much on adults age 40-75, that many clinicians forget that there are indeed CLASS 1 RECOMMENDATIONS to treat younger adults with statins:

1. Secondary prevention
2. LDL-C ≥190 mg/dL
December 17, 2024 at 6:06 PM