Shawna Follis Delgado
@shawnafollis.bsky.social
▪️ Epidemiology @StanfordMed ▪️ @NIH_NHLBI K99/R00
🔁 Stanford Propel & NHLBI T32 Postdoc
▪️ PhD Epidemiology ▪️MS Anthropology
🔁 Stanford Propel & NHLBI T32 Postdoc
▪️ PhD Epidemiology ▪️MS Anthropology
Reposted by Shawna Follis Delgado
Reposted by Shawna Follis Delgado
"DOGE's control of Notice of Funding Opportunities, or NOFOS, functioned by requiring federal agencies to send any new grant or award postings to a DOGE- controlled mailbox.
At least 30 funding opportunities piled up and languished in the DOGE-controlled mailbox," WaPo reports.
At least 30 funding opportunities piled up and languished in the DOGE-controlled mailbox," WaPo reports.
June 27, 2025 at 10:51 PM
"DOGE's control of Notice of Funding Opportunities, or NOFOS, functioned by requiring federal agencies to send any new grant or award postings to a DOGE- controlled mailbox.
At least 30 funding opportunities piled up and languished in the DOGE-controlled mailbox," WaPo reports.
At least 30 funding opportunities piled up and languished in the DOGE-controlled mailbox," WaPo reports.
Reposted by Shawna Follis Delgado
The list of grants covered in the APHA/UAW lawsuit has been posted. See links below.
storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.us...
storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.us...
storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.us...
storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.us...
storage.courtlistener.com
June 23, 2025 at 4:26 PM
The list of grants covered in the APHA/UAW lawsuit has been posted. See links below.
storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.us...
storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.us...
storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.us...
storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.us...
Reposted by Shawna Follis Delgado
Because on this record anyway, I don't see anyone pushing back against it.
Take a look at the people who have been named as defendants here. One of them is a cabinet-level officer. The other is not the same individual, but is now the director of the National Institutes of Health [Jay Bhattacharya].
Take a look at the people who have been named as defendants here. One of them is a cabinet-level officer. The other is not the same individual, but is now the director of the National Institutes of Health [Jay Bhattacharya].
June 17, 2025 at 1:48 PM
Because on this record anyway, I don't see anyone pushing back against it.
Take a look at the people who have been named as defendants here. One of them is a cabinet-level officer. The other is not the same individual, but is now the director of the National Institutes of Health [Jay Bhattacharya].
Take a look at the people who have been named as defendants here. One of them is a cabinet-level officer. The other is not the same individual, but is now the director of the National Institutes of Health [Jay Bhattacharya].
Reposted by Shawna Follis Delgado
Wondering if your grant will be reinstated from Monday's ruling? Check here.
Plaintiffs have uploaded a list of 848 (of the ~2400 total terminated) they say are covered because they're to institutions in the states aforementioned or a part of APHA/UAW.
The judge must approve the list first.
Plaintiffs have uploaded a list of 848 (of the ~2400 total terminated) they say are covered because they're to institutions in the states aforementioned or a part of APHA/UAW.
The judge must approve the list first.
storage.courtlistener.com
June 18, 2025 at 9:05 PM
Wondering if your grant will be reinstated from Monday's ruling? Check here.
Plaintiffs have uploaded a list of 848 (of the ~2400 total terminated) they say are covered because they're to institutions in the states aforementioned or a part of APHA/UAW.
The judge must approve the list first.
Plaintiffs have uploaded a list of 848 (of the ~2400 total terminated) they say are covered because they're to institutions in the states aforementioned or a part of APHA/UAW.
The judge must approve the list first.