Interesting! Is it still active?

Seems like on some subjects, Bluesky culture is just as shitty as X.

We are looking to collaborate with like-minded organizations; support, share expertise, and more.

Sounds interesting, would be happy to hear more. I've been working with @pepoospina.bsky.social on slowfeed, which was forked from our first iteration @cosmik.network. We are very interested in tools of this sort.

What tool are you working on?

Once a consensus is reached, the CN app's account will issue the note as a comment to the original post, so even before Bluesky and other apps add the UI for CN, people can see the notes on these apps and ask to participate themselves.

A solution might be to create a CN app with its own PDS and Bluesky account. CN participants will log in with their accounts to the CN app and create notes anonymously, saving them in the app's account PDS.

You could create a CN ATProto app instance, but the issue is that other apps (like Bluesky) won't necessarily add the notes feature to their apps. Another point is that notes should be anonymous.

Yes, the current mechanism does not allow it.

I like it! How do you imagine it in CoSMO? (I work with Ronen, specifically on NLP and semantics.) Maybe a class (a tag)? E.g. "Papare A is a goodRead." Would need to explicitly prompt the NLP parser to look for the sentiment. I usually try to asses the readability of papers before I read them.

From podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/m...
Yuval explains point 1 as such - an editor is held responsible for their decisions on the job. 2. we need a proof of humanity mechanism in our social media platforms.

Also related to our current work on Sensemaking Networks with @wesleyfinck.org @sharef.bsky.social @pepoospina.bsky.social
we think open science social media is a great place to experiment with new apps + protocols for fostering collective intelligence
paragraph.xyz/@sense-nets/...