We need to somehow create a G/Q with the fashion sense of Dudley.

Have you ever run against a study that changed a belief that you held deeply? Or do you dismiss anything you dislike without looking into it? Because while 18 minutes is enough time to read a paper, you seem to disagree with it while stating that if it were true that it wouldn't matter. Why is that?

I just said it was good. I didn't state my plans.

I feel like 'Should you be allowed to sing at Concerts' discourse is so directly connected to the quality of the closest singer. I'm all for it most of the time, but after some events I had very strongly held beliefs in letting the artist own the room.

Ah yes, I also can easily understand what is going on in this game. But for those fools in the back... what?

'The original party mix' is one of the three official names of the E.U.

But you learned a lesson at 12. It can't. You're selling 12yo you short! He was smarter than the best efforts of a worldwide corporation!

There was a day in high school when one of my older brothers stated I could easily take him in a fight. I was floored. Even though I'd been physically bigger than him since middle school I just didn't think such a thing could happen. We never did really fight after that day though, so who knows.

We need More Vague Posting and Less 'Let me reskeet the terrible gross article but tell you that I hate that the terrible gross article exists' Posting!

I feel you need to give the normal political process a chance to make changes.

But if that doesn't work, maybe give it a little extra push.

Nobody's Golf - We take back the land
Each According to their Golf - We redistribute the land
Laborer's Golf - With excess of Labor, all workers would have excess time to Golf

Kitty's Golf - I dunno, maybe a golf game with kitties?