I misremembered: it was the public editor after her they canned.

Yeah it seems like the only remedy is voting them out. Can’t wait for the campaign ads against each of them.

Yeah that’s what I didn’t get about the bill text. If there was no requirement to report, then at the time the conduct occurred it was lawful. You can’t just declare something unlawful after the fact and then claim damages from it.

Work emails at that. Ones they know have zero expectation of privacy.

This assumes they had coherent thoughts to begin with. Not much evidence of that.

They had an effective one in Margaret Sullivan and canned her because she asked too many good questions.

Here it is, from @clairewillett.bsky.social

The feeling that powerful people can break the law without consequence is what has been driving popular outrage on the left and right since 2008. It can all be traced back to people losing their homes and life savings while everyone on Wall Street responsible just moved on to the next grift.

Certainly not all of them, but yes, some of them.

I’m curious whether her decision was a factor in Senate Dems folding sooner. No judgment from me if so, but it did reinforce the that the shutdown could progress into some adverse judicial rulings as well.

I maintain that all of these people are crisis actors except their crisis is people being nice, well-rounded individuals.

Cheesesteaks AND poutine?!?

Where is this? Furloughed doesn’t end until the House votes 😂

00000111

The need to occupy Division and State. Except the Lodge, that place is legit.

Thanks!