@seancj.bsky.social
Ahem.. as I - or we - were saying :P
October 30, 2025 at 8:02 PM
Ahem.. as I - or we - were saying :P
Will, no alt text sucks. Here's the Halo image with alt text, just for a (I hope) model example.
And if you view that as too much trouble, can I suggest asking other people to alt text for you, and then post with that ? I'm sure there's plenty of people that are willing to do so!
And if you view that as too much trouble, can I suggest asking other people to alt text for you, and then post with that ? I'm sure there's plenty of people that are willing to do so!
October 29, 2025 at 9:51 PM
Will, no alt text sucks. Here's the Halo image with alt text, just for a (I hope) model example.
And if you view that as too much trouble, can I suggest asking other people to alt text for you, and then post with that ? I'm sure there's plenty of people that are willing to do so!
And if you view that as too much trouble, can I suggest asking other people to alt text for you, and then post with that ? I'm sure there's plenty of people that are willing to do so!
Because the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Xitter feed has went pretty openly neo-nazi (as Will Stancil is pointing out), I'll re-up this thread from the weekend on what felt like a distinct step up in escalation.
October 29, 2025 at 9:49 PM
Because the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Xitter feed has went pretty openly neo-nazi (as Will Stancil is pointing out), I'll re-up this thread from the weekend on what felt like a distinct step up in escalation.
One image in that video caught my eye:
Does anybody know the context of this / where this one came from? Cause the aesthetics are unmistakable (or at least to me, feel stupid to argue with):
Does anybody know the context of this / where this one came from? Cause the aesthetics are unmistakable (or at least to me, feel stupid to argue with):
October 29, 2025 at 6:22 PM
One image in that video caught my eye:
Does anybody know the context of this / where this one came from? Cause the aesthetics are unmistakable (or at least to me, feel stupid to argue with):
Does anybody know the context of this / where this one came from? Cause the aesthetics are unmistakable (or at least to me, feel stupid to argue with):
* Anonymous regime official makes clear they want to influence who Warner Bros. Discovery is sold to:
States to media that it is "important to" the regime who buys Warner Bros, and that the board needs to "think very seriously" on who will actually get the merger through - ie the Ellison family.
States to media that it is "important to" the regime who buys Warner Bros, and that the board needs to "think very seriously" on who will actually get the merger through - ie the Ellison family.
October 25, 2025 at 10:54 AM
* Anonymous regime official makes clear they want to influence who Warner Bros. Discovery is sold to:
States to media that it is "important to" the regime who buys Warner Bros, and that the board needs to "think very seriously" on who will actually get the merger through - ie the Ellison family.
States to media that it is "important to" the regime who buys Warner Bros, and that the board needs to "think very seriously" on who will actually get the merger through - ie the Ellison family.
Our city's power + heating utility actually built an thermal storage tower in the borough I used to live in 🙂.
It looks pretty cool :) !
It looks pretty cool :) !
October 19, 2025 at 6:19 PM
Our city's power + heating utility actually built an thermal storage tower in the borough I used to live in 🙂.
It looks pretty cool :) !
It looks pretty cool :) !
Can you even call this "Ratioed" :P ?
(Closer to Division by Zero error, lol 🤣 )
(Closer to Division by Zero error, lol 🤣 )
October 18, 2025 at 9:16 PM
Can you even call this "Ratioed" :P ?
(Closer to Division by Zero error, lol 🤣 )
(Closer to Division by Zero error, lol 🤣 )
Is it me, or is Matt Wuerker's latest cartoon not actually reachable from Politico's site right now ?
(Not from the main page - either via the cartoon collection or the below section; nor from his profile - www.politico.com/news/matt-wu...
(Not from the main page - either via the cartoon collection or the below section; nor from his profile - www.politico.com/news/matt-wu...
December 13, 2024 at 11:31 PM
Is it me, or is Matt Wuerker's latest cartoon not actually reachable from Politico's site right now ?
(Not from the main page - either via the cartoon collection or the below section; nor from his profile - www.politico.com/news/matt-wu...
(Not from the main page - either via the cartoon collection or the below section; nor from his profile - www.politico.com/news/matt-wu...