Thanks a lot for this fantastic thing.

I strongly wish there is a subarray for this specific to its brightness. Is there?

1-) interviews of Science Ascend (SA) with astrophysics related experts/faculty (max 1 post/month)
2-) announcing new SA issue (2/year)
3-) table of astrophysics conf/workshop with critical info and links (2/year)
There may be tutorial/workshop of SA too, but this is long term, not now.

fire-ae.org/ascend11.pdf
This is an official journal, registered and has quality and of benefit content. It is NOT peer reviewed yet and no one states that. Other than that, I request elaboration on which legitimacy problem we are talking. Can't we make literature reviews, for instance?

You need to check my issues, it is not randomly shuffling arxiv preprints. In the last 10 issues i was making literature reviews in arxiv preprints, while 11th issue was not even arxiv preprint related. 12 will again have literature reviews and many other content related to astrophysics.

It is so angry it fumes with so high volcanic activities.

Red is so intense <3

Both this galaxy and your detailed explanations are great! Thank you very much!

It is big with everyone of us including you as a part of it together.

Incredible job, so many interesting galaxies from a single target work! Of course, the largest object is mind blowing too!

www.stsci.edu/jwst/science...

C3D is COSMOS3D project name, followed by observations of different target galaxies from early universe.