Sara they/them
banner
scarr.bsky.social
Sara they/them
@scarr.bsky.social
when I say, "I love coffee," what I mean is, "I love David Lynch, who also loved coffee."
FINISHED READING WAR AND PEACE BY LEO TOLSTOY 28 OCTOBER, 2025
Judy Cuevas super-fan 🕎
scarrstuff.com
Reposted by Sara they/them
And, in what should be an automatic coda to any article about women's consumption of sexual material, anything good in erotica most certainly could not apply to porn. For ... reasons.

Sexy words: good. Sexy pictures: bad.

Society has so many weird rules about how women get off.
November 17, 2025 at 6:05 PM
I think there are interesting observations about the kinds of sex characters are having, enjoying, etc in popular romance. but whorephobia and anti-porn rhetoric is not doing the genre any favors. it is incredibly alienating and dehumanizing to read these papers often with little or no pushback.
November 17, 2025 at 2:26 AM
Reposted by Sara they/them
(banging table) MADELEINE

bsky.app/profile/sara...
which vampire from interview with the vampire would u date
November 16, 2025 at 8:09 PM
I burst out laughing when I got to the diagram lol. I was like, is this a joke? several times the author of the paper was like, "we don't know for sure but we will keep looking for harm" or "we don't necessarily think the government should ban porn . . . "
November 16, 2025 at 2:54 PM
I read the source the paper cited, A Sensible Antiporn Feminism by A. W. Eaton, and it did also suck!
November 16, 2025 at 2:38 PM
exactly! I feel insane that this kind of idea of fiction as a model for behavior is taken seriously.
November 15, 2025 at 8:41 PM
I was supposed to do things today not spiral about this piece of shit paper
November 15, 2025 at 7:59 PM
‼️‼️‼️
November 15, 2025 at 7:17 PM
*sources being the romance books
November 15, 2025 at 7:08 PM
it’s a mess! I think there is something to explore wrt what popular romance is saying about desire … but this is not it! it’s also not drawing from interesting sources sorry lol
November 15, 2025 at 7:07 PM
people writing these papers get hung up on the *aesthetics* of porn - angles, positions, etc. - discounting any possibility of porn being an art object and an object of labor worthy of evaluation, one that is not hung up on morality of its existence!
November 15, 2025 at 6:49 PM
it’s from North American Romance Writers!

www.goodreads.com/book/show/33...
North American Romance Writers
In this work, Kay Mussell and Johanna Tuñón collect ess…
www.goodreads.com
November 15, 2025 at 6:23 PM
anyway art doesn’t need to be didactic (romance is art, porn is art)
November 15, 2025 at 6:12 PM
this paper sucks and so does most romance scholarship wrt porn and sex work.
November 15, 2025 at 5:58 PM
thank you for understanding 😂🖤
November 14, 2025 at 12:43 AM
Reposted by Sara they/them
Anyway: pornographic art and performance is good, people have a right to the vast majority of their kinks, and it is ridiculous that consenting adults are finding those rights strangled by big tech and payment platforms
November 14, 2025 at 12:00 AM