Anyway, imagine if the federal government gave Amazon monopoly ownership of all US highways and guaranteed Amazon a 10% profit every year on their cumulative historical spending on highways, minus the debt they carried. Amazon would build a shitload of highways, the more expensive the better.

Credit to the Environmental Voter Project for working on awareness and turnout.

Can you be more specific about distortion risks? Do you think stronger staffing levels and tougher oversight could help mitigate risks? Would symmetrical incentives help?

Here’s what we said about the Administration slowing down clean energy while demand is rising from AI (tl;dr bad): techpolicy.press/trumps-ai-st...

Yes, lower FF capacity factors reflect clean energy supplanting power sector FF - great pathway to drive down GHG pollution via reduced operating hours. Having FF units available in the transition - particularly w increased DERs - helps protect reliability and reduces conflict over stranded assets.

Setting aside the basic question of consistency. If $ propels focus and energy for Tesla leadership why not apply that practice to employees. Look at the pay rate for Tesla employees compared to other auto makers.

You already have more focus and energy than eight Elons.
More importantly a focus and energy founded in facts and based on causes beyond self aggrandizement.