Samuli Reijula
@samulireijula.fediscience.org.ap.brid.gy
PhilSci & Cogsci at University of Helsinki / TINT. Carbon-based stochastic parrot? European Network for the Science of Science (www.euroscisci.net) […]
[bridged from https://fediscience.org/@samulireijula on the fediverse by https://fed.brid.gy/ ]
[bridged from https://fediscience.org/@samulireijula on the fediverse by https://fed.brid.gy/ ]
Reposted by Samuli Reijula
+ "Pitäisikö nyt keskustella tiedon sääntelystä? - ”Olisin ehdottomasti sen kannalla”, Riie Heikkilä sanoo. ” Puhutaanko tässä epistemologiasta? Vai sääntelystä jotenkin konkreettisemmassa yhteiskunnallisessa mielessä, siitä kuka saa esittää tietoväitteitä?
December 30, 2025 at 9:49 AM
+ "Pitäisikö nyt keskustella tiedon sääntelystä? - ”Olisin ehdottomasti sen kannalla”, Riie Heikkilä sanoo. ” Puhutaanko tässä epistemologiasta? Vai sääntelystä jotenkin konkreettisemmassa yhteiskunnallisessa mielessä, siitä kuka saa esittää tietoväitteitä?
Reposted by Samuli Reijula
Because the weights would be integrated into the hardware, it would be impossible to copy them from one machine to another; each AI would have to learn on its own. “They would have to go to school,” ... “But you would go from using a megawatt to 30 watts.” www.newyorker.com/magazine/202...
Why the Godfather of A.I. Fears What He’s Built
Geoffrey Hinton has spent a lifetime teaching computers to learn. Now he worries that artificial brains are better than ours.
www.newyorker.com
September 29, 2024 at 5:54 AM
Because the weights would be integrated into the hardware, it would be impossible to copy them from one machine to another; each AI would have to learn on its own. “They would have to go to school,” ... “But you would go from using a megawatt to 30 watts.” www.newyorker.com/magazine/202...
Reposted by Samuli Reijula
“Evidence is not a 2-place relation ‘e is evidence for h’. Rather,
Evidence is a 3-place relation.£
“The third place is to be filled by a good argument, a view, called ‘the argument theory of evidence’…This theory maintains that e is evidence for h relative to a good argument from e to h.”
Evidence is a 3-place relation.£
“The third place is to be filled by a good argument, a view, called ‘the argument theory of evidence’…This theory maintains that e is evidence for h relative to a good argument from e to h.”
August 4, 2024 at 11:40 AM
“Evidence is not a 2-place relation ‘e is evidence for h’. Rather,
Evidence is a 3-place relation.£
“The third place is to be filled by a good argument, a view, called ‘the argument theory of evidence’…This theory maintains that e is evidence for h relative to a good argument from e to h.”
Evidence is a 3-place relation.£
“The third place is to be filled by a good argument, a view, called ‘the argument theory of evidence’…This theory maintains that e is evidence for h relative to a good argument from e to h.”