Samuel Willis
@samuelwillis.bsky.social
Barrister. History, politics, constitutions, international/EU law
I found the job that was arguably the pivotal stepping stone to my current job via legal twitter. When people asked me for advice looking for jobs, I used to say 'look on Twitter' – locking into a Twitter niche was such a great way to find leads and opportunities and friends...
August 8, 2025 at 11:34 AM
I found the job that was arguably the pivotal stepping stone to my current job via legal twitter. When people asked me for advice looking for jobs, I used to say 'look on Twitter' – locking into a Twitter niche was such a great way to find leads and opportunities and friends...
I still miss legal twitter. Some of it can now be found on LinkedIn, but the constraints of that medium/the vibe of that site means it's just not the same.
August 8, 2025 at 11:30 AM
I still miss legal twitter. Some of it can now be found on LinkedIn, but the constraints of that medium/the vibe of that site means it's just not the same.
rated the good taste in book
June 15, 2025 at 2:35 PM
rated the good taste in book
We saw it on the same day! Completely agree, will be recommending it to my friends/family
May 25, 2025 at 9:42 AM
We saw it on the same day! Completely agree, will be recommending it to my friends/family
... against the tribunal's jurisdiction on justification must be rejected".
For reasons of judicial economy (and some issues about whether points were arguable in the appeal), the appeal was disposed on the basis of justification (i.e. 'even if there was interference, it was justified')
For reasons of judicial economy (and some issues about whether points were arguable in the appeal), the appeal was disposed on the basis of justification (i.e. 'even if there was interference, it was justified')
May 17, 2025 at 10:08 AM
... against the tribunal's jurisdiction on justification must be rejected".
For reasons of judicial economy (and some issues about whether points were arguable in the appeal), the appeal was disposed on the basis of justification (i.e. 'even if there was interference, it was justified')
For reasons of judicial economy (and some issues about whether points were arguable in the appeal), the appeal was disposed on the basis of justification (i.e. 'even if there was interference, it was justified')
[51] of Page: "if the point [i.e. interference] were determinative of the appeal it might be necessary for the court to consider it, however unsatisfactory the manner in which it emerged. however, we need not do so because, as will appear, I believe that *even if article 9 is engaged* the appeal...
May 17, 2025 at 10:08 AM
[51] of Page: "if the point [i.e. interference] were determinative of the appeal it might be necessary for the court to consider it, however unsatisfactory the manner in which it emerged. however, we need not do so because, as will appear, I believe that *even if article 9 is engaged* the appeal...