In the brief, Jane Manners argues that the history is clear: presidents don’t have unfettered authority to remove independent agency officials, such as FTC Commissioner Slaughter. Read: bit.ly/4nSvm9B
In the brief, Jane Manners argues that the history is clear: presidents don’t have unfettered authority to remove independent agency officials, such as FTC Commissioner Slaughter. Read: bit.ly/4nSvm9B
More filings for more cases are in the works as I type. For the latest on the Council, visit our project page, which collects the members' growing list of amicus briefs, highly attended online seminars, and media appearances:
More filings for more cases are in the works as I type. For the latest on the Council, visit our project page, which collects the members' growing list of amicus briefs, highly attended online seminars, and media appearances:
On Friday, Historians Council member @janemanners.bsky.social filed a brief in a D.C. Circuit case challenging the unconstitutional removal of the chair of the Federal Labor Relations Authority -- a key showdown on the scope of presidential power.
On Friday, Historians Council member @janemanners.bsky.social filed a brief in a D.C. Circuit case challenging the unconstitutional removal of the chair of the Federal Labor Relations Authority -- a key showdown on the scope of presidential power.
On Monday, 4 historians including the Historians Council's @alexkeyssar.bsky.social filed to encourage SCOTUS to reverse a damaging Voting Rights Act decision from the 8th Circuit, in a possible prelude to another critical VRA case this term.
On Monday, 4 historians including the Historians Council's @alexkeyssar.bsky.social filed to encourage SCOTUS to reverse a damaging Voting Rights Act decision from the 8th Circuit, in a possible prelude to another critical VRA case this term.
The appellate court said voters cannot sue to challenge discriminatory maps under the Voting Rights Act. The brief explains that's wrong, showing that courts, Congress, the Dep't of Justice, private attorneys, and others have long understood that Section 2 allows voters to do just that. 2/2
October 6, 2025 at 10:09 PM
The appellate court said voters cannot sue to challenge discriminatory maps under the Voting Rights Act. The brief explains that's wrong, showing that courts, Congress, the Dep't of Justice, private attorneys, and others have long understood that Section 2 allows voters to do just that. 2/2
That includes lessons on why we must have a capacious understanding of birthright citizenship today. The lesson: The US tried a regime of exclusive citizenship in the past (see Dred Scott) and we fought the Civil War to end it.
October 3, 2025 at 9:31 PM
That includes lessons on why we must have a capacious understanding of birthright citizenship today. The lesson: The US tried a regime of exclusive citizenship in the past (see Dred Scott) and we fought the Civil War to end it.