But they do *not* like preferential hiring.
Fears of blocked professional advancement among whites and men - fueled by very real, very crude cases - were mobilized by Republican elites to kill the entire DEI movement.
But they do *not* like preferential hiring.
Fears of blocked professional advancement among whites and men - fueled by very real, very crude cases - were mobilized by Republican elites to kill the entire DEI movement.
This is driven by gains among Asian-Americans --- who are super overrepresented relative to Hispanic and Black profs.
There's a real glass ceiling for Asian-Americans in leadership roles, though.
This is driven by gains among Asian-Americans --- who are super overrepresented relative to Hispanic and Black profs.
There's a real glass ceiling for Asian-Americans in leadership roles, though.
In 2004: 34.7% of senior leaders were women.
In 2024: 58.6%.
This isn’t a weird feature of these universities. 6 out of 8 Ivy League presidents were women by 2023!
But full professors? Moved from 18.2% → 31.1%.
Concrete progress but at half the pace of leadership.
In 2004: 34.7% of senior leaders were women.
In 2024: 58.6%.
This isn’t a weird feature of these universities. 6 out of 8 Ivy League presidents were women by 2023!
But full professors? Moved from 18.2% → 31.1%.
Concrete progress but at half the pace of leadership.
Senior leadership: +1.08 percentage points more Black after 2020
Assistant Professors: +0.23 percentage points more Black
Leadership was 5x MORE RESPONSIVE to diversity pressures than faculty hiring.
Senior leadership: +1.08 percentage points more Black after 2020
Assistant Professors: +0.23 percentage points more Black
Leadership was 5x MORE RESPONSIVE to diversity pressures than faculty hiring.
It *decreased* from 6.4% → 6.0% between 2004-2024.
But Black representation in senior leadership doubled from 6.7% → 11.6%
It *decreased* from 6.4% → 6.0% between 2004-2024.
But Black representation in senior leadership doubled from 6.7% → 11.6%