s3roberts.bsky.social
@s3roberts.bsky.social
Reposted
/4 (4) it’s on FACEBOOK for Christ’s sake. If the readers tried to do anything they’d break a hip. In short, it is absolutely typical, standard, unremarkable political rhetoric unequivocally protected by the First Amendment. Your feeling that it might not be is just wrong and you are wrong.
January 19, 2026 at 6:05 PM
Reposted
/3 Factors to consider in evaluating that: (1) it doesn’t call for any action, (2) it’s online, which is much less likely to be able to cause imminent lawless action, (3) it’s couched as criticism of a public official in political terms, making it unlikely to be seen as a call to violent action,
January 19, 2026 at 6:03 PM
Reposted
/2 First, it’s absolutely, unequivocally, definitively not actionable incitement outside the First Amendment. Not even Ilan Wurman would say so. To be outside First Amendment protection as incitement speech must be intended and likely to cause imminent lawless action. This speech is far from that.
January 19, 2026 at 6:02 PM
Reposted
ICE ended up returning the man, Saly, after realizing he’s a fucking US citizen with no criminal record, per his sister-in-law. These fucking animals.
January 19, 2026 at 2:42 PM
Reposted
Have you noticed ICE is consistently using suppressors (silencers) on their rifles?

Why are ICE agents using suppressors and battering rams to arrest old men and nonviolent people in broad daylight? This is for maximum effect imo.
January 19, 2026 at 1:33 PM