My overall point is made in the video: practically, the *expansion* of copyright in this case would not fix the problem of displacement and consolidate power in the hands of bad actors. I believe training should be considered fair use (with that caveat that outputs CAN be infringement in specific

My response to certain factual claims in this post and other general comments I've received about the video:
docs.google.com/document/d/e...

I've spent the last half year investigating the nefarious interests behind the anti-AI Backlash. The results were surprising.

1. I never claimed the lawsuit was dismissed, I claimed that the *specific* claims I was referencing were dismissed, namely, the ones about derivative works. [1:34:39]. I say “According to copyright law, a derivative work is one which substantially borrows the expression of ideas

bringing back this gem

they say "dont compare yourself to other people" but whenever i compare myself to other people it just reinforces how awesome i am

@rosencreutz.bsky.social wrt Marxist zoology (or at least, Marxist biology) look into Richard Lewontin.

I’m having a really hard time understanding people against assisted dying, and the more I engage with them the less I’m sympathetic to what they say. It feels like none of them actually know what any individual assisted dying bill says or does, and they flat out ignore the pain of death.

checked twitter out of curiosity only to see theres another geometry dash school shooting happening over there

@lukatv.lol add me to the GD feed

🎧📕 Are you an audiobook fan? We've got thousands of free audiobooks from public domain texts in our Librivox audiobooks collection! Check out Joseph Conrad's Heart of Darkness and many more: https://archive.org/details/heart_of_darkness #audiobook

Preview for my next video

One sad thing is that you can’t softblock anymore.

This feels strange