@rollingstone.com should maybe reevaluate its relationship with this guy. Any journalist willing to assert as fact something for which there is 1) no evidence, and 2) a wide consensus among experts against is not a reliable reporter.
@rollingstone.com should maybe reevaluate its relationship with this guy. Any journalist willing to assert as fact something for which there is 1) no evidence, and 2) a wide consensus among experts against is not a reliable reporter.